rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
+ rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+ if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
+ __rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rnp, rdp);
nocb += rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(rsp, rnp);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
cond_resched();
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end");
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+ rcu_advance_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp); /* Reduce false positives below. */
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
rsp->gp_flags = 1;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ /*
+ * If there is no grace period in progress right now, any
+ * callbacks we have up to this point will be satisfied by the
+ * next grace period. Also, advancing the callbacks reduces the
+ * probability of false positives from cpu_needs_another_gp()
+ * resulting in pointless grace periods. So, advance callbacks!
+ */
+ rcu_advance_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+
if (!rsp->gp_kthread ||
!cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
/*
return;
}
- /*
- * Because there is no grace period in progress right now,
- * any callbacks we have up to this point will be satisfied
- * by the next grace period. So this is a good place to
- * assign a grace period number to recently posted callbacks.
- */
- rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
-
rsp->gp_flags = RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT;
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* Interrupts remain disabled. */