[PATCH] nfsd4: fix open seqid incrementing in lock

In the case of a lock which introduces a new lockowner, the openowner's
sequence id should be incremented, even when the operation fails, if the
error is a sequence-id-mutating error.  The current code fails to do that
in some cases.  Fix this by using the same sequence-id-incrementing
mechanism that all other such operations use.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 11405e530e7080f8a29d8dcd8369b81005286b7d..ec2fdb009bf1af85e1dd757b80b506c0274c6d06 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -2629,7 +2629,9 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, str
        sop->so_is_open_owner = 0;
        sop->so_id = current_ownerid++;
        sop->so_client = clp;
-       sop->so_seqid = lock->lk_new_lock_seqid;
+       /* It is the openowner seqid that will be incremented in encode in the
+        * case of new lockowners; so increment the lock seqid manually: */
+       sop->so_seqid = lock->lk_new_lock_seqid + 1;
        sop->so_confirmed = 1;
        rp = &sop->so_replay;
        rp->rp_status = NFSERR_SERVERFAULT;
@@ -2684,6 +2686,7 @@ int
 nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock *lock, struct nfs4_stateowner **replay_owner)
 {
        struct nfs4_stateowner *open_sop = NULL;
+       struct nfs4_stateowner *lock_sop = NULL;
        struct nfs4_stateid *lock_stp;
        struct file *filp;
        struct file_lock file_lock;
@@ -2718,9 +2721,11 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock
                                        lock->lk_new_open_seqid,
                                        &lock->lk_new_open_stateid,
                                        CHECK_FH | OPEN_STATE,
-                                       &open_sop, &open_stp, lock);
+                                       &lock->lk_stateowner, &open_stp,
+                                       lock);
                if (status)
                        goto out;
+               open_sop = lock->lk_stateowner;
                /* create lockowner and lock stateid */
                fp = open_stp->st_file;
                strhashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval(fp->fi_inode, 
@@ -2730,16 +2735,15 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock
                 * the same file, or should they just be allowed (and
                 * create new stateids)? */
                status = nfserr_resource;
-               if (!(lock->lk_stateowner = alloc_init_lock_stateowner(strhashval, open_sop->so_client, open_stp, lock)))
+               lock_sop = alloc_init_lock_stateowner(strhashval,
+                               open_sop->so_client, open_stp, lock);
+               if (lock_sop == NULL)
                        goto out;
-               if ((lock_stp = alloc_init_lock_stateid(lock->lk_stateowner, 
-                                               fp, open_stp)) == NULL) {
-                       release_stateowner(lock->lk_stateowner);
-                       lock->lk_stateowner = NULL;
+               lock_stp = alloc_init_lock_stateid(lock_sop, fp, open_stp);
+               if (lock_stp == NULL) {
+                       release_stateowner(lock_sop);
                        goto out;
                }
-               /* bump the open seqid used to create the lock */
-               open_sop->so_seqid++;
        } else {
                /* lock (lock owner + lock stateid) already exists */
                status = nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(current_fh,
@@ -2749,6 +2753,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock
                                       &lock->lk_stateowner, &lock_stp, lock);
                if (status)
                        goto out;
+               lock_sop = lock->lk_stateowner;
        }
        /* lock->lk_stateowner and lock_stp have been created or found */
        filp = lock_stp->st_vfs_file;
@@ -2779,7 +2784,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock
                        status = nfserr_inval;
                goto out;
        }
-       file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t) lock->lk_stateowner;
+       file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lock_sop;
        file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid;
        file_lock.fl_file = filp;
        file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
@@ -2835,9 +2840,6 @@ out_destroy_new_stateid:
                 * An error encountered after instantiation of the new
                 * stateid has forced us to destroy it.
                 */
-               if (!seqid_mutating_err(status))
-                       open_sop->so_seqid--;
-
                release_state_owner(lock_stp, LOCK_STATE);
        }
 out: