static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- struct request *rq = NULL;
+ struct request *rq;
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
struct elevator_type *et;
struct io_context *ioc;
* process is not a "batcher", and not
* exempted by the IO scheduler
*/
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
}
}
}
* allocated with any setting of ->nr_requests
*/
if (rl->count[is_sync] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
if ((rw_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV) && unlikely(et->icq_cache && !icq)) {
icq = ioc_create_icq(q, gfp_mask);
if (!icq)
- goto fail_icq;
+ goto fail_alloc;
}
rq = blk_alloc_request(q, icq, rw_flags, gfp_mask);
-
-fail_icq:
- if (unlikely(!rq)) {
- /*
- * Allocation failed presumably due to memory. Undo anything
- * we might have messed up.
- *
- * Allocating task should really be put onto the front of the
- * wait queue, but this is pretty rare.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- freed_request(q, rw_flags);
-
- /*
- * in the very unlikely event that allocation failed and no
- * requests for this direction was pending, mark us starved
- * so that freeing of a request in the other direction will
- * notice us. another possible fix would be to split the
- * rq mempool into READ and WRITE
- */
-rq_starved:
- if (unlikely(rl->count[is_sync] == 0))
- rl->starved[is_sync] = 1;
-
- goto out;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!rq))
+ goto fail_alloc;
/*
* ioc may be NULL here, and ioc_batching will be false. That's
ioc->nr_batch_requests--;
trace_block_getrq(q, bio, rw_flags & 1);
-out:
return rq;
+
+fail_alloc:
+ /*
+ * Allocation failed presumably due to memory. Undo anything we
+ * might have messed up.
+ *
+ * Allocating task should really be put onto the front of the wait
+ * queue, but this is pretty rare.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ freed_request(q, rw_flags);
+
+ /*
+ * in the very unlikely event that allocation failed and no
+ * requests for this direction was pending, mark us starved so that
+ * freeing of a request in the other direction will notice
+ * us. another possible fix would be to split the rq mempool into
+ * READ and WRITE
+ */
+rq_starved:
+ if (unlikely(rl->count[is_sync] == 0))
+ rl->starved[is_sync] = 1;
+ return NULL;
}
/**