]> git.proxmox.com Git - mirror_ubuntu-jammy-kernel.git/commitdiff
RDMA/umem: Handle a half-complete start/end sequence
authorJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Sun, 16 Sep 2018 17:48:10 +0000 (20:48 +0300)
committerDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:58:36 +0000 (11:58 -0400)
mmu_notifier_unregister() can race between a invalidate_start/end and
cause the invalidate_end to be skipped. This causes an imbalance in the
locking, which lockdep complains about.

This is not actually a bug, as we immediately kfree the memory holding the
lock, but it simple enough to fix.

Mark when the notifier is being destroyed and abort the start callback.
This can be done under the lock we already obtained, and can re-purpose
the invalidate_range test we already have.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c
include/rdma/ib_umem_odp.h

index 1c0c4a431218603f885f7511bef6edb218c4eeb3..d7b6422b961164603277429a59ddf6f4830295f1 100644 (file)
@@ -129,15 +129,11 @@ static void ib_umem_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
        struct ib_ucontext_per_mm *per_mm =
                container_of(mn, struct ib_ucontext_per_mm, mn);
 
-       if (!per_mm->context->invalidate_range)
-               return;
-
        down_read(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
-       rbt_ib_umem_for_each_in_range(&per_mm->umem_tree, 0,
-                                     ULLONG_MAX,
-                                     ib_umem_notifier_release_trampoline,
-                                     true,
-                                     NULL);
+       if (per_mm->active)
+               rbt_ib_umem_for_each_in_range(
+                       &per_mm->umem_tree, 0, ULLONG_MAX,
+                       ib_umem_notifier_release_trampoline, true, NULL);
        up_read(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
 }
 
@@ -166,16 +162,22 @@ static int ib_umem_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 {
        struct ib_ucontext_per_mm *per_mm =
                container_of(mn, struct ib_ucontext_per_mm, mn);
-       int ret;
-
-       if (!per_mm->context->invalidate_range)
-               return 0;
 
        if (blockable)
                down_read(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
        else if (!down_read_trylock(&per_mm->umem_rwsem))
                return -EAGAIN;
 
+       if (!per_mm->active) {
+               up_read(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
+               /*
+                * At this point active is permanently set and visible to this
+                * CPU without a lock, that fact is relied on to skip the unlock
+                * in range_end.
+                */
+               return 0;
+       }
+
        return rbt_ib_umem_for_each_in_range(&per_mm->umem_tree, start, end,
                                             invalidate_range_start_trampoline,
                                             blockable, NULL);
@@ -196,7 +198,7 @@ static void ib_umem_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
        struct ib_ucontext_per_mm *per_mm =
                container_of(mn, struct ib_ucontext_per_mm, mn);
 
-       if (!per_mm->context->invalidate_range)
+       if (unlikely(!per_mm->active))
                return;
 
        rbt_ib_umem_for_each_in_range(&per_mm->umem_tree, start,
@@ -251,6 +253,7 @@ static struct ib_ucontext_per_mm *alloc_per_mm(struct ib_ucontext *ctx,
        per_mm->mm = mm;
        per_mm->umem_tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
        init_rwsem(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
+       per_mm->active = ctx->invalidate_range;
 
        rcu_read_lock();
        per_mm->tgid = get_task_pid(current->group_leader, PIDTYPE_PID);
@@ -321,6 +324,16 @@ void put_per_mm(struct ib_umem_odp *umem_odp)
        if (!need_free)
                return;
 
+       /*
+        * NOTE! mmu_notifier_unregister() can happen between a start/end
+        * callback, resulting in an start/end, and thus an unbalanced
+        * lock. This doesn't really matter to us since we are about to kfree
+        * the memory that holds the lock, however LOCKDEP doesn't like this.
+        */
+       down_write(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
+       per_mm->active = false;
+       up_write(&per_mm->umem_rwsem);
+
        mmu_notifier_unregister(&per_mm->mn, per_mm->mm);
        put_pid(per_mm->tgid);
        kfree(per_mm);
index ce950254590330a44911e086dd6f184173514d58..ec05c82ead7af30fc80634d7536a50fa4983658e 100644 (file)
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct ib_ucontext_per_mm {
        struct ib_ucontext *context;
        struct mm_struct *mm;
        struct pid *tgid;
+       bool active;
 
        struct rb_root_cached umem_tree;
        /* Protects umem_tree */