BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852338
[ Upstream commit
669996add4c92476e0f8d6b4cd2bb308d1939fd7 ]
When we're destroying the host transport mechanism, we should ensure
that we do not leak memory by failing to release any back channel
slots that might still exist.
Reported-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
return 0;
}
+static inline void xprt_destroy_backchannel(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
+ unsigned int max_reqs)
+{
+}
+
static inline bool svc_is_backchannel(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
{
return false;
goto out;
spin_lock_bh(&xprt->bc_pa_lock);
- xprt->bc_alloc_max -= max_reqs;
+ xprt->bc_alloc_max -= min(max_reqs, xprt->bc_alloc_max);
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &xprt->bc_pa_list, rq_bc_pa_list) {
dprintk("RPC: req=%p\n", req);
list_del(&req->rq_bc_pa_list);
rpc_destroy_wait_queue(&xprt->sending);
rpc_destroy_wait_queue(&xprt->backlog);
kfree(xprt->servername);
+ /*
+ * Destroy any existing back channel
+ */
+ xprt_destroy_backchannel(xprt, UINT_MAX);
+
/*
* Tear down transport state and free the rpc_xprt
*/