For reasons that may become clear shortly, I was looking at the
libseccomp man pages and I noticed a few small typos ... here they are
in patch format, hopefully my mail program doesn't botch the white
space ...
Signed-off-by: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
.B enum scmp_filter_attr;
.sp
.BI "int seccomp_attr_set(enum scmp_filter_attr " attr ", uint32_t " value ");"
-.BI "int seccomp_attr_get(enum scmp_filter_attr " attr ", uint32_t " value ");"
+.BI "int seccomp_attr_get(enum scmp_filter_attr " attr ", uint32_t *" value ");"
.fi
.//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
.SH DESCRIPTION
.B SCMP_ACT_ERRNO(uint16_t errno)
The process will receive a return value of
.I errno
-when it calls a syscall that does not match any of the configure seccomp filter
+when it calls a syscall that does not match any of the configured seccomp filter
rules.
.TP
.B SCMP_ACT_TRACE(uint16_t msg_num)
.B SCMP_ACT_ERRNO(uint16_t errno)
The process will receive a return value of
.I errno
-when it calls a syscall that does not match any of the configure seccomp filter
+when it calls a syscall that does not match any of the configured seccomp filter
rules.
.TP
.B SCMP_ACT_TRACE(uint16_t msg_num)
)
.TP
.B SCMP_CMP_GE
-Matches when the argument value is greather than or equal to the datum value,
+Matches when the argument value is greater than or equal to the datum value,
example:
.sp
SCMP_CMP(