This option is unused; besides, it bloats the struct when not needed.
Let's just let writers define their own locks elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Message-Id: <
1465412133-3029-3-git-send-email-cota@braap.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
void cpu_ticks_init(void)
{
- seqlock_init(&timers_state.vm_clock_seqlock, NULL);
+ seqlock_init(&timers_state.vm_clock_seqlock);
vmstate_register(NULL, 0, &vmstate_timers, &timers_state);
throttle_timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL_RT,
cpu_throttle_timer_tick, NULL);
typedef struct QemuSeqLock QemuSeqLock;
struct QemuSeqLock {
- QemuMutex *mutex;
unsigned sequence;
};
-static inline void seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl, QemuMutex *mutex)
+static inline void seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl)
{
- sl->mutex = mutex;
sl->sequence = 0;
}
/* Lock out other writers and update the count. */
static inline void seqlock_write_lock(QemuSeqLock *sl)
{
- if (sl->mutex) {
- qemu_mutex_lock(sl->mutex);
- }
++sl->sequence;
/* Write sequence before updating other fields. */
smp_wmb();
++sl->sequence;
- if (sl->mutex) {
- qemu_mutex_unlock(sl->mutex);
- }
}
static inline unsigned seqlock_read_begin(QemuSeqLock *sl)