It looks like when tlb_invalidation.seqno overflows
TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_MAX, we start counting again from one, as per
send_tlb_invalidation(). This is also inline with initial value we give
it in xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init(). When calculating the
expected_seqno we should also take this into account.
While we are here also print out the values if we ever trigger the
warning.
v2 (José):
- drm_WARN_ON() is preferred over plain WARN_ON(), since it gives
information on the originating device.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/248
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
/* Sanity check on seqno */
expected_seqno = (gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv + 1) %
TLB_INVALIDATION_SEQNO_MAX;
- XE_WARN_ON(expected_seqno != msg[0]);
+ if (!expected_seqno)
+ expected_seqno = 1;
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(>->xe->drm, expected_seqno != msg[0])) {
+ drm_err(>->xe->drm, "TLB expected_seqno(%d) != msg(%u)\n",
+ expected_seqno, msg[0]);
+ }
gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv = msg[0];
smp_wmb();