Miao Xie [Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:10:10 +0000 (08:10 +0000)]
Btrfs: make delayed ref lock logic more readable
Locking and unlocking delayed ref mutex are in the different functions,
and the name of lock functions is not uniform, so the readability is not
so good, this patch optimizes the lock logic and makes it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:59:51 +0000 (06:59 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space is not enough
We're running into having 50-100 orphans left over with xfstests 83
because of ENOSPC when trying to start the transaction for the inode update.
But in fact, it makes no sense in updating the inode for the new size while
we're deleting the stupid thing. This patch fixes this problem.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:31:02 +0000 (11:31 -0700)]
btrfs: access superblock via pagecache in scan_one_device
btrfs_scan_one_device is calling set_blocksize() which can race
with a concurrent process making dirty page cache pages. It can end up
dropping dirty page cache pages on the floor, which isn't very nice when
someone is just running btrfs dev scan to find filesystems on the
box.
Now that udev is registering btrfs devices as it discovers them, we can
actually end up racing with our own mkfs program too. When this
happens, we drop some of the important blocks written by mkfs.
This commit changes scan_one_device to read the super out of the page
cache instead of trying to use bread. This way we don't have to care
about the blocksize of the device.
This also drops the invalidate_bdev() call. It wasn't very polite to
invalidate during the scan either. mkfs is putting the super into the
page cache, there's no reason to invalidate at this point.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Arne Jansen [Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:20:01 +0000 (04:20 -0700)]
Btrfs: fix crash in log replay with qgroups enabled
When replaying a log tree with qgroups enabled, tree_mod_log_rewind does a
sanity-check of the number of items against the maximum possible number.
It calculates that number with the nodesize of fs_root. Unfortunately
fs_root is not yet set at this stage. So instead use the nodesize from
tree_root, which is already initialized.
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Chris Mason [Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:06:02 +0000 (12:06 -0500)]
Btrfs: move d_instantiate outside the transaction during mksubvol
Dave Sterba triggered a lockdep complaint about lock ordering
between the sb_internal lock and the cleaner semaphore.
btrfs_lookup_dentry() checks for orphans if we're looking up
the inode for a subvolume, and subvolume creation is triggering
the lookup with a transaction running.
This commit moves the d_instantiate after the transaction closes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Jan Schmidt [Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:26:00 +0000 (23:26 -0700)]
Btrfs: fix EDQUOT handling in btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata
When btrfs_qgroup_reserve returned a failure, we were missing a counter
operation for BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++, leading to warning
messages about outstanding extents and space_info->bytes_may_use != 0.
Additionally, the error handling code didn't take into account that we
dropped the inode lock which might require more cleanup.
Luckily, all the cleanup code we need is already there and can be shared
with reserve_metadata_bytes, which is exactly what this patch does.
Reported-by: Lev Vainblat <lev@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:31:31 +0000 (14:31 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix possible stale data exposure
We specifically do not update the disk i_size if there are ordered extents
outstanding for any area between the current disk_i_size and our ordered
extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is the check we
have only checks if the ordered extent starts at or after the current
disk_i_size, which doesn't take into account an ordered extent that starts
before the current disk_i_size and ends past the disk_i_size. Fix this by
checking if the extent ends past the disk_i_size. Thanks,
Josef Bacik [Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:17:31 +0000 (14:17 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix missing i_size update
If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently
completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size
update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The
problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered
extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update. So check
the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need
to go ahead and try to update. Thanks,
Liu Bo [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:22:10 +0000 (03:22 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix race between snapshot deletion and getting inode
While running snapshot testscript created by Mitch and David,
the race between autodefrag and snapshot deletion can lead to
corruption of dead_root list so that we can get crash on
btrfs_clean_old_snapshots().
And besides autodefrag, scrub also does the same thing, ie. read
root first and get inode.
Here is the story(take autodefrag as an example):
(1) when we delete a snapshot or subvolume, it will set its root's
refs to zero and do a iput() on its own inode, and if this inode happens
to be the only active in-meory one in root's inode rbtree, it will add
itself to the global dead_roots list for later cleanup.
(2) after (1), the autodefrag thread may read another inode for defrag
and the inode is just in the deleted snapshot/subvolume, but all of these
are without checking if the root is still valid(refs > 0). So the end up
result is adding the deleted snapshot/subvolume's root to the global
dead_roots list AGAIN.
Fortunately, we already have a srcu lock to avoid the race, ie. subvol_srcu.
So all we need to do is to take the lock to protect 'read root and get inode',
since we synchronize to wait for the rcu grace period before adding something
to the global dead_roots list.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:45:20 +0000 (09:45 -0500)]
Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree
You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree,
but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it. The
problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if
we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems.
Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree. Thanks,
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:55:02 +0000 (00:55 +0000)]
btrfs: don't try to notify udev about missing devices
If we remove a missing device, bdev is null, and if we
send that off to btrfs_kobject_uevent we'll panic.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:49:00 +0000 (10:49 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix repeated delalloc work allocation
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the
first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/
btrfs_queue_worker for this inode, and then it locks the list, checks the
head of the list again. But because we don't delete the first inode that it
deals with before, it will fetch the same inode. As a result, this function
allocates a huge amount of btrfs_delalloc_work structures, and OOM happens.
Fix this problem by splice this delalloc list.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:27:17 +0000 (11:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix wrong max device number for single profile
The max device number of single profile is 1, not 0 (0 means 'as many as
possible'). Fix it.
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:29:12 +0000 (06:29 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix missed transaction->aborted check
First, though the current transaction->aborted check can stop the commit early
and avoid unnecessary operations, it is too early, and some transaction handles
don't end, those handles may set transaction->aborted after the check.
Second, when we commit the transaction, we will wake up some worker threads to
flush the space cache and inode cache. Those threads also allocate some transaction
handles and may set transaction->aborted if some serious error happens.
So we need more check for ->aborted when committing the transaction. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:27:25 +0000 (06:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to transaction->abort accesses
We may access and update transaction->aborted on the different CPUs without
lock, so we need ACCESS_ONCE() wrapper to prevent the compiler from creating
unsolicited accesses and make sure we can get the right value.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:43:09 +0000 (15:43 -0500)]
Btrfs: put csums on the right ordered extent
I noticed a WARN_ON going off when adding csums because we were going over
the amount of csum bytes that should have been allowed for an ordered
extent. This is a leftover from when we used to hold the csums privately
for direct io, but now we use the normal ordered sum stuff so we need to
make sure and check if we've moved on to another extent so that the csums
are added to the right extent. Without this we could end up with csums for
bytenrs that don't have extents to cover them yet. Thanks,
Liu Bo [Sun, 6 Jan 2013 03:38:22 +0000 (03:38 +0000)]
Btrfs: use right range to find checksum for compressed extents
For compressed extents, the range of checksum is covered by disk length,
and the disk length is different with ram length, so we need to use disk
length instead to get us the right checksum.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:39:19 +0000 (11:39 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix panic when recovering tree log
A user reported a BUG_ON(ret) that occured during tree log replay. Ret was
-EAGAIN, so what I think happened is that we removed an extent that covered
a bitmap entry and an extent entry. We remove the part from the bitmap and
return -EAGAIN and then search for the next piece we want to remove, which
happens to be an entire extent entry, so we just free the sucker and return.
The problem is ret is still set to -EAGAIN so we trip the BUG_ON(). The
user used btrfs-zero-log so I'm not 100% sure this is what happened so I've
added a WARN_ON() to catch the other possibility. Thanks,
Reported-by: Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:02:07 +0000 (12:02 -0500)]
Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removed
We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody
could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up our
logging, or they could even remove us from the list which would keep us from
logging the extent or freeing our ref on it, so we need to make sure to not
clear LOGGING until after the extent is logged, and then we can merge it to
adjacent extents. Thanks,
Ilya Dryomov [Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:15:56 +0000 (15:15 +0200)]
Btrfs: fix a regression in balance usage filter
Commit 3fed40cc ("Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functions"), which
was merged into 3.8-rc1, has introduced a regression by removing logic
that was guarding us against bad user input. Bring it back.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Arne Jansen [Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:22:09 +0000 (01:22 -0700)]
Btrfs: prevent qgroup destroy when there are still relations
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other qgroups
or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless
they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Arne Jansen [Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:22:08 +0000 (01:22 -0700)]
Btrfs: ignore orphan qgroup relations
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding
relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem.
With this patch, those relations are simple ignored.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:57:57 +0000 (15:57 +0200)]
Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error code
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually
exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently
changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add. Returning EINPROGRESS
to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore,
the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes.
Ilya Dryomov [Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:57:57 +0000 (15:57 +0200)]
Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logic
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1
as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making
mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance,
replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is
in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end
relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a
complete rework, it's the best we can do.
Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Eric Sandeen [Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:57:22 +0000 (02:57 +0000)]
btrfs: update timestamps on truncate()
truncate() vs. ftruncate() differ in the VFS; truncate()
doesn't set (ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME), and it's up to the
fs to do the timestamp updates if the size changes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this
error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors
(ENOMEM, EIO; whatever).
This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR
em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to
use IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:10:12 +0000 (10:10 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix a bug when llseek for delalloc bytes behind prealloc extents
xfstests case 285 complains.
It it because btrfs did not try to find unwritten delalloc
bytes(only dirty pages, not yet writeback) behind prealloc
extents, it ends up finding nothing while we're with SEEK_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:01:24 +0000 (09:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: let allocation start from the right raid type
This'd avoid us empty looping.
Say we have only one disk and the metadata raid type will be defaultly DUP,
and we do not need to start from index=0(RAID10) and get over two empty
loops to index=2(DUP).
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:03:21 +0000 (17:03 -0500)]
Btrfs: add orphan before truncating pagecache
Running xfstests 83 in a loop would sometimes fail the fsck. This happens
because if we invalidate a page that already has an ordered extent setup for
it we will complete the ordered extent ourselves, assuming that the truncate
will clean everything up. The problem with this is there is plenty of time
for the truncate to fail after we've done this work. So to fix this we need
to add the orphan item first to make sure the cleanup gets done properly,
and then we can truncate the pagecache and all that stuff and be safe. This
fixes the btrfsck failures I was seeing while running 83 in a loop. Thanks,
Miao Xie [Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:39:53 +0000 (11:39 +0000)]
Btrfs: do not delete a subvolume which is in a R/O subvolume
Step to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs <disk>
# mount <disk> <mnt>
# btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv0
# btrfs sub snap <mnt> <mnt>/subv0/snap0
# change <mnt>/subv0 from R/W to R/O
# btrfs sub del <mnt>/subv0/snap0
We deleted the snapshot successfully. I think we should not be able to delete
the snapshot since the parent subvolume is R/O.
Lukas Czerner [Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:09:19 +0000 (10:09 +0000)]
btrfs: get the device in write mode when deleting it
When we're deleting the device we should get it in write mode since
we're going to re-write the super block magic on that device. And it
should fail if the device is read-only.
Chris Mason [Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:26:57 +0000 (14:26 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix hash overflow handling
The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure,
split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is
supposed to bubble up to userland. For a while it did so, but along the
way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we
hit IO errors during the directory insertion.
Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case
was dropped. The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we
catch a directory hash bucket overflow.
This fixes a few problem spots. First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the
places where we can safely just return the error up the chain.
btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new
directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename
was going to overwrite. Rather than adding very complex logic, I added
a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe
to bail out.
Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using
the new helper now too.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Reported-by: Pascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:48:14 +0000 (13:48 -0500)]
Btrfs: don't take inode delalloc mutex if we're a free space inode
This confuses and angers lockdep even though it's ok. We don't really need
the lock for free space inodes since only the transaction committer will be
reserving space. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:46:43 +0000 (13:46 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix autodefrag and umount lockup
This happens because writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle does down_read. This
doesn't work for us and it has not been fixed upstream yet, so do it
ourselves and use that instead so we can stop having this stupid long
standing lockup. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask
When a new file is created with btrfs_create(), the inode will initially be
created with permissions 0666 and later on in btrfs_init_acl() it will be
adapted to mask out the umask bits. The problem is that this change won't make
it into the btrfs_inode unless there's another change to the inode (e.g. writing
content changing the size or touching the file changing the mtime.)
This fix adds a call to btrfs_update_inode() to btrfs_create() to make sure that
the change will not get lost if the in-memory inode is flushed before other
changes are made to the file.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:57:29 +0000 (18:57 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix BUG() in scrub when first superblock reading gives EIO
This fixes a very special case that can be reproduced by just
disconnecting a disk at runtime, and without unmounting the
filesystem first, start scrub on the filesystem with the
disconnected disk. All read and write EIOs are handled
correctly, only the first superblock is an exception and gives
a BUG() in a subfunction. The BUG() is correct, it would crash
later otherwise. The subfunction must not be called for
superblocks and this is what the fix changes.
Reported-by: Joeri Vanthienen <mail@joerivanthienen.be> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:53:21 +0000 (10:53 -0500)]
Btrfs: do not call file_update_time in aio_write
This starts a transaction and dirties the inode everytime we call it, which
is super expensive if you have a write heavy workload. We will be updating
the inode when the IO completes and we reserve the space for the inode
update when we reserve space for the write, so there is no chance of loss of
information or enospc issues. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:44:13 +0000 (13:44 -0500)]
Btrfs: only unlock and relock if we have to
I noticed while doing fsync tests that we were always dropping the path and
re-searching when we first cow the log root even though we've already gotten
the write lock on the root. That's because we don't take into account that
there might not be a parent node, so fix the check to make sure there is
actually a parent node before we undo all of this work for nothing. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:03:44 +0000 (16:03 -0400)]
Btrfs: use tokens where we can in the tree log
If we are syncing over and over the overhead of doing all those maps in
fill_inode_item and log_changed_extents really starts to hurt, so use map
tokens so we can avoid all the extra mapping. Since the token maps from our
offset to the end of the page make sure to set the first thing in the item
first so we really only do one map. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:43:18 +0000 (13:43 -0400)]
Btrfs: optimize leaf_space_used
This gets called at least 4 times for every level while adding an object,
and it involves 3 kmapping calls, which on my box take about 5us a piece.
So instead use a token, which brings us down to 1 kmap call and makes this
function take 1/3 of the time per call. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:39:33 +0000 (13:39 -0400)]
Btrfs: don't memset new tokens
Our token logic depends on token->kaddr being set, and if it is not it sets
everything properly as needed. So instead of memsetting just set
token->kaddr to NULL. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:54:30 +0000 (16:54 -0400)]
Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map tree
We don't really need to copy extents from the source tree since we have all
of the information already available to us in the extent_map tree. So
instead just write the extents straight to the log tree and don't bother to
copy the extent items from the source tree.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:00:01 +0000 (17:00 -0500)]
Btrfs: add path->really_keep_locks
You'd think path->keep_locks would keep all the locks wouldn't you? You'd
be wrong. It only keeps them if the slot is pointing to the last item in
the node. This is for use with btrfs_next_leaf, which needs this sort of
thing. But the horrible horrible things I'm going to do to the tree log
means I really need everything held from root to leaf so I can add and
delete items in the same search. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:58:15 +0000 (10:58 -0500)]
Btrfs: do not mark ems as prealloc if we are writing to them
We are going to use EM's to log extents in the future, so we need to not
mark them as prealloc if they aren't actually prealloc extents. Instead
mark them with FILLING so we know to ammend mod_start/mod_len and that way
we don't confuse the extent logging code. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:31:19 +0000 (10:31 -0500)]
Btrfs: keep track of the extents original block length
If we've written to a prealloc extent we need to know the original block len
for the extent. We can't figure this out currently since ->block_len is
just set to the extent length. So introduce ->orig_block_len so that we
know how many bytes were in the original extent for proper extent logging
that future patches will need. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:56:32 +0000 (13:56 -0500)]
Btrfs: inline csums if we're fsyncing
The tree logging stuff needs the csums to be on the ordered extents in order
to log them properly, so mark that we're sync and inline the csum creation
so we don't have to wait on the csumming to be done when logging extents
that are still in flight. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:17:34 +0000 (16:17 -0400)]
Btrfs: don't bother copying if we're only logging the inode
We don't copy inode items anwyay, we just copy them straight into the log
from the in memory inode. So if we know we're only logging the inode, don't
bother dropping anything, just try to insert it and either if it succeeds or
we get EEXIST we can update the inode item in the log and carry on. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:53:56 +0000 (15:53 -0400)]
Btrfs: only log the inode item if we can get away with it
Currently we copy all the file information into the log, inode item, the
refs, xattrs etc. Except most of this doesn't change from fsync to fsync,
just the inode item changes. So set a flag if an xattr changes or a link is
added, and otherwise only log the inode item. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:28:54 +0000 (09:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: rename root_times_lock to root_item_lock
Originally root_times_lock was introduced as part of send/receive
code however newly developed patch to label the subvol reused
the same lock, so renaming it for a meaningful name.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Lukas Czerner [Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:25:48 +0000 (19:25 +0000)]
btrfs: Notify udev when removing device
Currently udev does not know about the device being removed from the
file system. This may result in the situation where we're unable to
mount the file system by UUID or by LABEL because the by-uuid and
by-label links may still point to the device which is no longer part of
the btrfs file system and hence does not have any btrfs super block.
We did not noticed this before because libblkid would send the udev
event for us when it notice that the link does not fit the reality,
however it does not do that anymore and completely relies on udev
information.
Fix this by sending the KOBJ_CHANGE event to the bdev kobject after
successful device removal.
Note that this does not affect device addition, because we will open the
device prior the addition from userspace and udev will notice that and
reread the device afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:56:13 +0000 (10:56 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix wrong return value of btrfs_truncate_page()
ret variant may be set to 0 if we read page successfully, but it might be
released before we lock it again. On this case, if we fail to allocate a
new page, we will return 0, it is wrong, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:54:52 +0000 (10:54 +0000)]
Btrfs: punch hole past the end of the file
Since we can pre-allocate the space past EOF, we should be able to reclaim
that space if we need. This patch implements it by removing the EOF check.
Though the manual of fallocate command says we can use truncate command to
reclaim the pre-allocated space which past EOF, but because truncate command
changes the file size, we must run several commands to reclaim the space if we
don't want to change the file size, so it is not a good choice.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The reason is that we inputed a range which is beyond the end of the file. And
because the end of this range was not page-aligned, we had to truncate the last
page in this range, this operation is similar to a buffered file write. In other
words, we reserved enough space and clear the data which was in the hole range
on that page. But when we expanded that test file, write the data into the same
page, we forgot that we have reserved enough space for the buffered write of
that page because in most cases there is no page that is beyond the end of
the file. As a result, we reserved the space twice.
In fact, we needn't truncate the page if it is beyond the end of the file, just
release the allocated space in that range. Fix the above problem by this way.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:53:45 +0000 (10:53 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix off-by-one error of the same page check in btrfs_punch_hole()
(start + len) is the start of the adjacent extent, not the end of the current
extent, so we should not use it to check the hole is on the same page or not.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Sheng-Hui [Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:30:14 +0000 (06:30 +0000)]
Btrfs: use ctl->unit for free space calculation instead of block_group->sectorsize
We should use ctl->unit for free space calculation instead of block_group->sectorsize
even though for free space use_bitmap or free space cluster we only have sectorsize assigned to ctl->unit currently. Also, we can keep it consisten in code style.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: refactor error handling to drop inode in btrfs_create()
Refactor it by checking whether the inode has been created and needs to be
dropped (drop_inode_on_err) and also if the err variable is set. That way the
variable doesn't need to be set on each and every error handling block.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask
When a new file is created with btrfs_create(), the inode will initially be
created with permissions 0666 and later on in btrfs_init_acl() it will be
adapted to mask out the umask bits. The problem is that this change won't make
it into the btrfs_inode unless there's another change to the inode (e.g. writing
content changing the size or touching the file changing the mtime.)
This fix adds a call to btrfs_update_inode() to btrfs_create() to make sure that
the change will not get lost if the in-memory inode is flushed before other
changes are made to the file.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:28:54 +0000 (10:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix off-by-one error of the reserved size of btrfs_allocate()
alloc_end is not the real end of the current extent, it is the start of the
next adjoining extent. So we needn't +1 when calculating the size the space
that is about to be reserved.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:39:51 +0000 (17:39 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix a scrub regression in case of write errors
This regression was introduced by the device-replace patches.
Scrub immediately stops checking those disks that have write errors.
This is nothing that happens in the real world, but it is wrong
since scrub is the tool to detect and repair defects. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:10:21 +0000 (16:10 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix race in check-integrity caused by usage of bitfield
The structure member mirror_num is modified concurrently to the
structure member is_iodone. This doesn't require any locking by
design, unless everything is stored in the same 32 bits of a
bit field. This was the case and xfstest 284 was able to
trigger false warnings from the checker code. This patch
seperates the bits and fixes the race.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:44:50 +0000 (08:44 +0000)]
Btrfs: get write access when removing a device
Steps to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs -d single -m single <disk0> <disk1>
# mount -o ro <disk0> <mnt0>
# mount -o ro <disk0> <mnt1>
# mount -o remount,rw <mnt0>
# umount <mnt0>
# btrfs device delete <disk1> <mnt1>
We can remove a device from a R/O filesystem. The reason is that we just check
the R/O flag of the super block object. It is not enough, because the kernel
may set the R/O flag only for the mount point. We need invoke
mnt_want_write_file()
to do a full check.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
projects / mirror_ubuntu-hirsute-kernel.git / log