]> git.proxmox.com Git - mirror_ubuntu-kernels.git/log
mirror_ubuntu-kernels.git
14 months agobtrfs: fix a compilation error if DEBUG is defined in btree_dirty_folio
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 22 Aug 2023 05:50:51 +0000 (13:50 +0800)]
btrfs: fix a compilation error if DEBUG is defined in btree_dirty_folio

[BUG]
After commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap"), the DEBUG section of btree_dirty_folio() would
no longer compile.

[CAUSE]
If DEBUG is defined, we would do extra checks for btree_dirty_folio(),
mostly to make sure the range we marked dirty has an extent buffer and
that extent buffer is dirty.

For subpage, we need to iterate through all the extent buffers covered
by that page range, and make sure they all matches the criteria.

However commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap") changes how we store the bitmap, we pack all the
16 bits bitmaps into a larger bitmap, which would save some space.

This means we no longer have btrfs_subpage::dirty_bitmap, instead the
dirty bitmap is starting at btrfs_subpage_info::dirty_offset, and has a
length of btrfs_subpage_info::bitmap_nr_bits.

[FIX]
Although I'm not sure if it still makes sense to maintain such code, at
least let it compile.

This patch would let us test the bits one by one through the bitmaps.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
14 months agobtrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert
Josef Bacik [Thu, 24 Aug 2023 20:59:04 +0000 (16:59 -0400)]
btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert

If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current
transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for.  This means we
expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the
ordered extent.  However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean
it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the
"ASSERT(trans)" check.  This is obviously incorrect, and the code
properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist.  Fix
this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
14 months agobtrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items
Filipe Manana [Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:34:52 +0000 (11:34 +0100)]
btrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items

When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then
we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the
delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example,
btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent
buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the
delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the
delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported
by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline]
         lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781
         up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625
         btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline]
         btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239
         search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline]
         btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230
         btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376
         btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline]
         btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline]
         __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153
         flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723
         btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078
         process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600
         worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751
         kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
         lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
         __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
         __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
         __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
         btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
         btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
         vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
         vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
         do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
         __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
         __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
         __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
                                 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257:
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline]
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287
   #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
   #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
   lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
   __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
   __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
   mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
   btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
   __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
   btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
   vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
   vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
   do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
   __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
   __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
   __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8
   </TASK>
  ------------[ cut here ]------------

Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the
error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items().

Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
14 months agobtrfs: do not block starts waiting on previous transaction commit
Josef Bacik [Thu, 24 Aug 2023 20:59:22 +0000 (16:59 -0400)]
btrfs: do not block starts waiting on previous transaction commit

Internally I got a report of very long stalls on normal operations like
creating a new file when auto relocation was running.  The reporter used
the 'bpf offcputime' tracer to show that we would get stuck in
start_transaction for 5 to 30 seconds, and were always being woken up by
the transaction commit.

Using my timing-everything script, which times how long a function takes
and what percentage of that total time is taken up by its children, I
saw several traces like this

1083 took 32812902424 ns
        29929002926 ns 91.2110% wait_for_commit_duration
        25568 ns 7.7920e-05% commit_fs_roots_duration
        1007751 ns 0.00307% commit_cowonly_roots_duration
        446855602 ns 1.36182% btrfs_run_delayed_refs_duration
        271980 ns 0.00082% btrfs_run_delayed_items_duration
        2008 ns 6.1195e-06% btrfs_apply_pending_changes_duration
        9656 ns 2.9427e-05% switch_commit_roots_duration
        1598 ns 4.8700e-06% btrfs_commit_device_sizes_duration
        4314 ns 1.3147e-05% btrfs_free_log_root_tree_duration

Here I was only tracing functions that happen where we are between
START_COMMIT and UNBLOCKED in order to see what would be keeping us
blocked for so long.  The wait_for_commit() we do is where we wait for a
previous transaction that hasn't completed it's commit.  This can
include all of the unpin work and other cleanups, which tends to be the
longest part of our transaction commit.

There is no reason we should be blocking new things from entering the
transaction at this point, it just adds to random latency spikes for no
reason.

Fix this by adding a PREP stage.  This allows us to properly deal with
multiple committers coming in at the same time, we retain the behavior
that the winner waits on the previous transaction and the losers all
wait for this transaction commit to occur.  Nothing else is blocked
during the PREP stage, and then once the wait is complete we switch to
COMMIT_START and all of the same behavior as before is maintained.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
14 months agobtrfs: release path before inode lookup during the ino lookup ioctl
Filipe Manana [Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:28:20 +0000 (11:28 +0100)]
btrfs: release path before inode lookup during the ino lookup ioctl

During the ino lookup ioctl we can end up calling btrfs_iget() to get an
inode reference while we are holding on a root's btree. If btrfs_iget()
needs to lookup the inode from the root's btree, because it's not
currently loaded in memory, then it will need to lock another or the
same path in the same root btree. This may result in a deadlock and
trigger the following lockdep splat:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor277/5012 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88802df41710 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
         down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
         __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
         btrfs_search_slot+0x13a4/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2302
         btrfs_init_root_free_objectid+0x148/0x320 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4955
         btrfs_init_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1128 [inline]
         btrfs_get_root_ref+0x5ae/0xae0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1338
         btrfs_get_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1390 [inline]
         open_ctree+0x29c8/0x3030 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3494
         btrfs_fill_super+0x1c7/0x2f0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1154
         btrfs_mount_root+0x7e0/0x910 fs/btrfs/super.c:1519
         legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
         vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
         fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1112 [inline]
         vfs_kern_mount+0xbc/0x150 fs/namespace.c:1142
         btrfs_mount+0x39f/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1579
         legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
         vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
         do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0 fs/namespace.c:3335
         do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
         __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
         __se_sys_mount+0x2d9/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3861
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
         lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
         down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
         __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
         btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
         btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
         btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
         btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
         btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
         btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
         btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
         btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
         btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
         vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
         __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    rlock(btrfs-tree-00);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-01);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    rlock(btrfs-tree-01);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by syz-executor277/5012:
   #0: ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 5012 Comm: syz-executor277 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
   lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
   down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
   btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
   btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
   btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
   btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
   btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
   btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
   btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
   btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
   btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f0bec94ea39

Fix this simply by releasing the path before calling btrfs_iget() as at
point we don't need the path anymore.

Reported-by: syzbot+bf66ad948981797d2f1d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000045fa140603c4a969@google.com/
Fixes: 23d0b79dfaed ("btrfs: Add unprivileged version of ino_lookup ioctl")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
14 months agobtrfs: fix race between finishing block group creation and its item update
Filipe Manana [Mon, 4 Sep 2023 11:10:31 +0000 (12:10 +0100)]
btrfs: fix race between finishing block group creation and its item update

Commit 675dfe1223a6 ("btrfs: fix block group item corruption after
inserting new block group") fixed one race that resulted in not persisting
a block group's item when its "used" bytes field decreases to zero.
However there's another race that can happen in a much shorter time window
that results in the same problem. The following sequence of steps explains
how it can happen:

1) Task A creates a metadata block group X, its "used" and "commit_used"
   fields are initialized to 0;

2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is
   updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0;

3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters
   btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block
   group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with
   a value of 32K and its "commit_used" field with a value of 0. However
   that fails since the block group item was not yet inserted, so at
   update_block_group_item(), the btrfs_search_slot() call returns 1, and
   then we set 'ret' to -ENOENT. Before jumping to the label 'fail'...

4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example
   btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its
   transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting
   the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a
   "used" field having a value of 32K and setting "commit_used", in struct
   btrfs_block_group, to the same value (32K);

5) Task B jumps to the 'fail' label and then resets the "commit_used"
   field to 0. At btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), because -ENOENT was
   returned from update_block_group_item(), we add the block group again
   to the list of dirty block groups, so that we will try again in the
   critical section of the transaction commit when calling
   btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups();

6) Later the two extents from block group X are freed, so its "used" field
   becomes 0;

7) If no more extents are allocated from block group X before we get into
   btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), then when we call
   update_block_group_item() again for block group X, we will not update
   the block group item to reflect that it has 0 bytes used, because the
   "used" and "commit_used" fields in struct btrfs_block_group have the
   same value, a value of 0.

   As a result after committing the transaction we have an empty block
   group with its block group item having a 32K value for its "used" field.
   This will trigger errors from fsck ("btrfs check" command) and after
   mounting again the fs, the cleaner kthread will not automatically delete
   the empty block group, since its "used" field is not 0. Possibly there
   are other issues due to this inconsistency.

   When this issue happens, the error reported by fsck is like this:

     [1/7] checking root items
     [2/7] checking extents
     block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0
     ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
     (...)

So fix this by not resetting the "commit_used" field of a block group when
we don't find the block group item at update_block_group_item().

Fixes: 7248e0cebbef ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: skip splitting and logical rewriting on pre-alloc write
Naohiro Aota [Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:26:07 +0000 (01:26 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: skip splitting and logical rewriting on pre-alloc write

When doing a relocation, there is a chance that at the time of
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(), there is no checksum for the corresponding
region.

In this case, btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned()'s sum points to an invalid item
and so ordered_extent's logical is set to some invalid value. Then,
btrfs_lookup_block_group() in btrfs_zone_finish_endio() failed to find a
block group and will hit an assert or a null pointer dereference as
following.

This can be reprodcued by running btrfs/028 several times (e.g, 4 to 16
times) with a null_blk setup. The device's zone size and capacity is set to
32 MB and the storage size is set to 5 GB on my setup.

    KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f]
    CPU: 6 PID: 3105720 Comm: kworker/u16:13 Tainted: G        W          6.5.0-rc6-kts+ #1
    Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 2.0 12/17/2015
    Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
    RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
    Code: 41 54 49 89 fc 55 48 89 f5 53 e8 57 7d fc ff 48 8d b8 88 00 00 00 48 89 c3 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00
    > 3c 02 00 0f 85 02 01 00 00 f6 83 88 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a8 00 00
    RSP: 0018:ffff88833cf87b08 EFLAGS: 00010206
    RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
    RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088
    RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102877b827
    R10: ffff888143bdc13b R11: ffff888125b1cbc0 R12: ffff888143bdc000
    R13: 0000000000007000 R14: ffff888125b1cba8 R15: 0000000000000000
    FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88881e500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    CR2: 00007f3ed85223d5 CR3: 00000001519b4005 CR4: 00000000001706e0
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0
     ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220
     ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
     ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
     ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x19/0x160 [btrfs]
     btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x7b8/0x1de0 [btrfs]
     ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
     ? lock_release+0x47a/0x620
     ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x59b/0x800 [btrfs]
     ? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
     ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x358/0x800 [btrfs]
     ? __smp_call_single_queue+0x124/0x350
     ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
     btrfs_work_helper+0x19f/0xc60 [btrfs]
     ? __pfx_try_to_wake_up+0x10/0x10
     ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
     ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
     process_one_work+0x8c1/0x1430
     ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
     ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
     ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
     ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x52/0x60
     worker_thread+0x100/0x12c0
     ? __kthread_parkme+0xc1/0x1f0
     ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
     kthread+0x2ea/0x3c0
     ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
     ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
     ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
     ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
     </TASK>

On the zoned mode, writing to pre-allocated region means data relocation
write. Such write always uses WRITE command so there is no need of splitting
and rewriting logical address. Thus, we can just skip the function for the
case.

Fixes: cbfce4c7fbde ("btrfs: optimize the logical to physical mapping for zoned writes")
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: tests: test invalid splitting when skipping pinned drop extent_map
Josef Bacik [Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:57:33 +0000 (16:57 -0400)]
btrfs: tests: test invalid splitting when skipping pinned drop extent_map

This reproduces the bug fixed by "btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in
btrfs_drop_extent_map_range", we were improperly calculating the range
for the split extent.  Add a test that exercises this scenario and
validates that we get the correct resulting extent_maps in our tree.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: tests: add a test for btrfs_add_extent_mapping
Josef Bacik [Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:57:32 +0000 (16:57 -0400)]
btrfs: tests: add a test for btrfs_add_extent_mapping

This helper is different from the normal add_extent_mapping in that it
will stuff an em into a gap that exists between overlapping em's in the
tree.  It appeared there was a bug so I wrote a self test to validate it
did the correct thing when it worked with two side by side ems.
Thankfully it is correct, but more testing is better.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: tests: add extent_map tests for dropping with odd layouts
Josef Bacik [Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:57:31 +0000 (16:57 -0400)]
btrfs: tests: add extent_map tests for dropping with odd layouts

While investigating weird problems with the extent_map I wrote a self
test testing the various edge cases of btrfs_drop_extent_map_range.
This can split in different ways and behaves different in each case, so
test the various edge cases to make sure everything is functioning
properly.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: move write back of repaired sectors to scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker()
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 06:33:33 +0000 (14:33 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: move write back of repaired sectors to scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker()

Currently the scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker() only does reads to
rebuild the corrupted sectors, it doesn't do any writeback.

The design is mostly to put writeback into a more ordered manner, to
co-operate with dev-replace with zoned mode, which requires every write
to be submitted in their bytenr order.

However the writeback for repaired sectors into the original mirror
doesn't need such strong sync requirement, as it can only happen for
non-zoned devices.

This patch would move the writeback for repaired sectors into
scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(), which removes two calls sites for
repaired sectors writeback. (one from flush_scrub_stripes(), one from
scrub_raid56_parity_stripe())

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: don't go ordered workqueue for dev-replace
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 06:33:32 +0000 (14:33 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: don't go ordered workqueue for dev-replace

The workqueue fs_info->scrub_worker would go ordered workqueue if it's a
device replace operation.

However the scrub is relying on multiple workers to do data csum
verification, and we always submit several read requests in a row.

Thus there is no need to use ordered workqueue just for dev-replace.
We have extra synchronization (the main thread will always
submit-and-wait for dev-replace writes) to handle it for zoned devices.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: fix grouping of read IO
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 06:33:31 +0000 (14:33 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: fix grouping of read IO

[REGRESSION]
There are several regression reports about the scrub performance with
v6.4 kernel.

On a PCIe 3.0 device, the old v6.3 kernel can go 3GB/s scrub speed, but
v6.4 can only go 1GB/s, an obvious 66% performance drop.

[CAUSE]
Iostat shows a very different behavior between v6.3 and v6.4 kernel:

  Device         r/s      rkB/s   rrqm/s  %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz  %util
  nvme0n1p3  9731.00 3425544.00 17237.00  63.92    2.18   352.02  21.18 100.00
  nvme0n1p3 15578.00  993616.00     5.00   0.03    0.09    63.78   1.32 100.00

The upper one is v6.3 while the lower one is v6.4.

There are several obvious differences:

- Very few read merges
  This turns out to be a behavior change that we no longer do bio
  plug/unplug.

- Very low aqu-sz
  This is due to the submit-and-wait behavior of flush_scrub_stripes(),
  and extra extent/csum tree search.

Both behaviors are not that obvious on SATA SSDs, as SATA SSDs have NCQ
to merge the reads, while SATA SSDs can not handle high queue depth well
either.

[FIX]
For now this patch focuses on the read speed fix. Dev-replace replace
speed needs more work.

For the read part, we go two directions to fix the problems:

- Re-introduce blk plug/unplug to merge read requests
  This is pretty simple, and the behavior is pretty easy to observe.

  This would enlarge the average read request size to 512K.

- Introduce multi-group reads and no longer wait for each group
  Instead of the old behavior, which submits 8 stripes and waits for
  them, here we would enlarge the total number of stripes to 16 * 8.
  Which is 8M per device, the same limit as the old scrub in-flight
  bios size limit.

  Now every time we fill a group (8 stripes), we submit them and
  continue to next stripes.

  Only when the full 16 * 8 stripes are all filled, we submit the
  remaining ones (the last group), and wait for all groups to finish.
  Then submit the repair writes and dev-replace writes.

  This should enlarge the queue depth.

This would greatly improve the merge rate (thus read block size) and
queue depth:

Before (with regression, and cached extent/csum path):

 Device         r/s      rkB/s   rrqm/s  %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz  %util
 nvme0n1p3 20666.00 1318240.00    10.00   0.05    0.08    63.79   1.63 100.00

After (with all patches applied):

 nvme0n1p3  5165.00 2278304.00 30557.00  85.54    0.55   441.10   2.81 100.00

i.e. 1287 to 2224 MB/s.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary csum tree search preparing stripes
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 06:33:30 +0000 (14:33 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary csum tree search preparing stripes

One of the bottleneck of the new scrub code is the extra csum tree
search.

The old code would only do the csum tree search for each scrub bio,
which can be as large as 512KiB, thus they can afford to allocate a new
path each time.

But the new scrub code is doing csum tree search for each stripe, which
is only 64KiB, this means we'd better re-use the same csum path during
each search.

This patch would introduce a per-sctx path for csum tree search, as we
don't need to re-allocate the path every time we need to do a csum tree
search.

With this change we can further improve the queue depth and improve the
scrub read performance:

Before (with regression and cached extent tree path):

 Device         r/s      rkB/s   rrqm/s  %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz  %util
 nvme0n1p3 15875.00 1013328.00    12.00   0.08    0.08    63.83   1.35 100.00

After (with both cached extent/csum tree path):

 nvme0n1p3 17759.00 1133280.00    10.00   0.06    0.08    63.81   1.50 100.00

Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary extent tree search preparing stripes
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 06:33:29 +0000 (14:33 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary extent tree search preparing stripes

Since commit e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror()
to scrub_stripe infrastructure"), scrub no longer re-use the same path
for extent tree search.

This can lead to unnecessary extent tree search, especially for the new
stripe based scrub, as we have way more stripes to prepare.

This patch would re-introduce a shared path for extent tree search, and
properly release it when the block group is scrubbed.

This change alone can improve scrub performance slightly by reducing the
time spend preparing the stripe thus improving the queue depth.

Before (with regression):

 Device         r/s      rkB/s   rrqm/s  %rrqm r_await rareq-sz aqu-sz  %util
 nvme0n1p3 15578.00  993616.00     5.00   0.03    0.09    63.78   1.32 100.00

After (with this patch):

 nvme0n1p3 15875.00 1013328.00    12.00   0.08    0.08    63.83   1.35 100.00

Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume
Lee Trager [Fri, 11 Aug 2023 01:44:35 +0000 (18:44 -0700)]
btrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume

btrfs supports creating nested subvolumes however snapshots are not
recursive.  When a snapshot is taken of a volume which contains a
subvolume the subvolume is replaced with a stub subvolume which has the
same name and uses inode number 2[1]. The stub subvolume kept the
directory name but did not set the time or permissions of the stub
subvolume. This resulted in all time information being the current time
and ownership defaulting to root. When subvolumes and snapshots are
created using unshare this results in a snapshot directory the user
created but has no permissions for.

Test case:

  [vmuser@archvm ~]# sudo -i
  [root@archvm ~]# mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/test
  [root@archvm ~]# chown vmuser:users /mnt/btrfs/test/
  [root@archvm ~]# exit
  logout
  [vmuser@archvm ~]$ cd /mnt/btrfs/test
  [vmuser@archvm test]$ unshare --user --keep-caps --map-auto --map-root-user
  [root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume create subvolume
  Create subvolume './subvolume'
  [root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume create subvolume/subsubvolume
  Create subvolume 'subvolume/subsubvolume'
  [root@archvm test]# btrfs subvolume snapshot subvolume snapshot
  Create a snapshot of 'subvolume' in './snapshot'
  [root@archvm test]# exit
  logout
  [vmuser@archvm test]$ tree -ug
  [vmuser   users   ]  .
  â”œâ”€â”€ [vmuser   users   ]  snapshot
  â”‚   â””── [vmuser   users   ]  subsubvolume  <-- Without patch perm is root:root
  â””── [vmuser   users   ]  subvolume
      â””── [vmuser   users   ]  subsubvolume

  5 directories, 0 files

[1] https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-subvolume.html#nested-subvolumes

Signed-off-by: Lee Trager <lee@trager.us>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove pointless empty list check when reading delayed dir indexes
Filipe Manana [Sun, 13 Aug 2023 15:03:28 +0000 (16:03 +0100)]
btrfs: remove pointless empty list check when reading delayed dir indexes

At btrfs_readdir_delayed_dir_index(), called when reading a directory, we
have this check for an empty list to return immediately, but it's not
needed since list_for_each_entry_safe(), called immediately after, is
prepared to deal with an empty list, it simply does nothing. So remove
the empty list check.

Besides shorter source code, it also slightly reduces the binary text
size:

  Before this change:

    $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
       text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
    1609408  167269   16864 1793541  1b5e05 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

  After this change:

    $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
       text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
    1609392  167269   16864 1793525  1b5df5 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: drop redundant check to use fs_devices::metadata_uuid
Anand Jain [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:16:36 +0000 (19:16 +0800)]
btrfs: drop redundant check to use fs_devices::metadata_uuid

fs_devices::metadata_uuid value is already updated based on the
super_block::METADATA_UUID flag for either fsid or metadata_uuid as
appropriate. So, fs_devices::metadata_uuid can be used directly.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super
Anand Jain [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:16:35 +0000 (19:16 +0800)]
btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the metadata_uuid in
the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to
do that.

Such as in the following stacks:

  write_all_supers()
   sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
   btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
     btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

  scrub_one_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::metadata_uuid
instead.  Fix this using the correct metadata_uuid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super
Anand Jain [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:16:34 +0000 (19:16 +0800)]
btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided
superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that.

Such as in the following stack:

   write_all_supers()
       sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
       btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
         btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

   scrub_one_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead,
which is not correct.  Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: simplify memcpy either of metadata_uuid or fsid
Anand Jain [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:16:33 +0000 (19:16 +0800)]
btrfs: simplify memcpy either of metadata_uuid or fsid

There is a helper which provides either metadata_uuid or fsid as per
METADATA_UUID flag. So use it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid
Anand Jain [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:16:32 +0000 (19:16 +0800)]
btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid

In some cases, we need to read the FSID from the superblock when the
metadata_uuid is not set, and otherwise, read the metadata_uuid. So,
add a helper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove v0 extent handling
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:02:11 +0000 (19:02 +0800)]
btrfs: remove v0 extent handling

The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have
any report from the community either.

So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error handling, and just
treat them as regular extent tree corruption.

This patch would remove the btrfs_print_v0_err() helper, and enhance the
involved error handling to treat them just as any extent tree
corruption. No reports regarding v0 extents have been seen since the
graceful handling was added in 2018.

This involves:

- btrfs_backref_add_tree_node()
  This change is a little tricky, the new code is changed to only handle
  BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY.

  But this is safe, as we have rejected any unknown inline refs through
  btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type().
  For keyed backrefs, we're safe to skip anything we don't know (that's
  if it can pass tree-checker in the first place).

- btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
- lookup_inline_extent_backref()
- run_delayed_extent_op()
- __btrfs_free_extent()
- add_tree_block()
  Regular error handling of unexpected extent tree item, and abort
  transaction (if we have a trans handle).

- remove_extent_data_ref()
  It's pretty much the same as the regular rejection of unknown backref
  key.
  But for this particular case, we can also remove a BUG_ON().

- extent_data_ref_count()
  We can remove the BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY BUG_ON(), as it would be
  rejected by the only caller.

- btrfs_print_leaf()
  Remove the handling for BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:02:28 +0000 (19:02 +0800)]
btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref

[BUG]
Syzbot reported several warning triggered inside
lookup_inline_extent_backref().

[CAUSE]
As usual, the reproducer doesn't reliably trigger locally here, but at
least we know the WARN_ON() is triggered when an inline backref can not
be found, and it can only be triggered when @insert is true. (I.e.
inserting a new inline backref, which means the backref should already
exist)

[ENHANCEMENT]
After the WARN_ON(), dump all the parameters and the extent tree
leaf to help debug.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d6f9ff86c1d804ba2bc6
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: move the !zoned assert into run_delalloc_cow
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:22:41 +0000 (07:22 -0700)]
btrfs: move the !zoned assert into run_delalloc_cow

Having the assert in the actual helper documents the pre-conditions
much better than having it in the caller, so move it.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: consolidate the error handling in run_delalloc_nocow
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:22:40 +0000 (07:22 -0700)]
btrfs: consolidate the error handling in run_delalloc_nocow

Share the calls to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc for btrfs_path allocation
failure handling and the normal exit path.

This relies on btrfs_free_path ignoring a NULL pointer, and the
initialization of cur_offset to start at the beginning of the function.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: cleanup the COW fallback logic in run_delalloc_nocow
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:22:39 +0000 (07:22 -0700)]
btrfs: cleanup the COW fallback logic in run_delalloc_nocow

Use the block group pointer used to track the outstanding NOCOW writes as
a boolean to remove the duplicate nocow variable, and keep it contained
in the main loop to simplify the logic.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: fix error handling when in a COW window in run_delalloc_nocow
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:22:38 +0000 (07:22 -0700)]
btrfs: fix error handling when in a COW window in run_delalloc_nocow

When run_delalloc_nocow has cow_start set to a value other than (u64)-1,
it has delayed COW writeback pending behind cur_offset.  When an error
occurs in such a window, the range going back to cow_start and not just
cur_offset needs to be unlocked, but only two error cases handle this
correctly  Move the code to handle unlock the COW range to the common
error handling label and document the logic.

To make things even more complicated, cow_file_range as called by
fallback_to_cow will unlock the range it is operating on when it fails as
well, so we need to reset cow_start right after caling fallback_to_cow
instead of only when it succeeded.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: do not zone finish data relocation block group
Naohiro Aota [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:42:14 +0000 (16:42 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: do not zone finish data relocation block group

When multiple writes happen at once, we may need to sacrifice a currently
active block group to be zone finished for a new allocation. We choose a
block group with the least free space left, and zone finish it.

To do the finishing, we need to send IOs for already allocated region
and wait for them and on-going IOs. Otherwise, these IOs fail because the
zone is already finished at the time the IO reach a device.

However, if a block group dedicated to the data relocation is zone
finished, there is a chance that finishing it before an ongoing write IO
reaches the device. That is because there is timing gap between an
allocation is done (block_group->reservations == 0, as pre-allocation is
done) and an ordered extent is created when the relocation IO starts.
Thus, if we finish the zone between them, we can fail the IOs.

We cannot simply use "fs_info->data_reloc_bg == block_group->start" to
avoid the zone finishing. Because, the data_reloc_bg may already switch to
a new block group, while there are still ongoing write IOs to the old
data_reloc_bg.

So, this patch reworks the BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONED_DATA_RELOC bit to
indicate there is a data relocation allocation and/or ongoing write to the
block group. The bit is set on allocation and cleared in end_io function of
the last IO for the currently allocated region.

To change the timing of the bit setting also solves the issue that the bit
being left even after there is no IO going on. With the current code, if
the data_reloc_bg switches after the last IO to the current data_reloc_bg,
the bit is set at this timing and there is no one clearing that bit. As a
result, that block group is kept unallocatable for anything.

Fixes: 343d8a30851c ("btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG")
Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page
Josef Bacik [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:13:00 +0000 (11:13 -0400)]
btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page

One of the CI runs triggered the following panic

  assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 0 PID: 923660 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3+ #1
  pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
  pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  sp : ffff800093213720
  x29: ffff800093213720 x28: ffff8000932138b4 x27: 000000000c280000
  x26: 00000001b5d00000 x25: 000000000c281000 x24: 000000000c281fff
  x23: 0000000000001000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff42b95bf880
  x20: ffff42b9528e0000 x19: 0000000000001000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
  x17: 667274622f736620 x16: 6e69202c65746176 x15: 0000000000000028
  x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 00000000002672d7 x12: 0000000000000000
  x11: ffffcd3f0ccd9204 x10: ffffcd3f0554ae50 x9 : ffffcd3f0379528c
  x8 : ffff800093213428 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffffcd3f091771e8
  x5 : ffff42b97f333948 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
  x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff42b9556cde80 x0 : 000000000000004f
  Call trace:
   btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
   btrfs_subpage_set_dirty+0x38/0xa0
   btrfs_page_set_dirty+0x58/0x88
   relocate_one_page+0x204/0x5f0
   relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x11c/0x180
   relocate_data_extent+0xd0/0xf8
   relocate_block_group+0x3d0/0x4e8
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2d8/0x490
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x54/0x1a8
   btrfs_balance+0x7f4/0x1150
   btrfs_ioctl+0x10f0/0x20b8
   __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x120/0x11d8
   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8
   do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x158
   el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0
   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
   el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
  Code: 91098021 b0007fa0 91346000 97e9c6d2 (d4210000)

This is the same problem outlined in 17b17fcd6d44 ("btrfs:
set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand") , and the
fix is the same.  I originally looked for the same pattern elsewhere in
our code, but mistakenly skipped over this code because I saw the page
cache readahead before we set_page_extent_mapped, not realizing that
this was only in the !page case, that we can still end up with a
!uptodate page and then do the btrfs_read_folio further down.

The fix here is the same as the above mentioned patch, move the
set_page_extent_mapped call to after the btrfs_read_folio() block to
make sure that we have the subpage blocksize stuff setup properly before
using the page.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: wait on uncached block groups on every allocation loop
Josef Bacik [Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:28:43 +0000 (16:28 -0400)]
btrfs: wait on uncached block groups on every allocation loop

My initial fix for the generic/475 hangs was related to metadata, but
our CI testing uncovered another case where we hang for similar reasons.
We again have a task with a plug that is holding an outstanding request
that is keeping the dm device from finishing it's suspend, and that task
is stuck in the allocator.

This time it is stuck trying to allocate data, but we do not have a
block group that matches the size class.  The larger loop in the
allocator looks like this (simplified of course)

  find_free_extent
    for_each_block_group {
      ffe_ctl->cached == btrfs_block_group_cache_done(bg)
      if (!ffe_ctl->cached)
ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg = true;
      do_allocation()
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress();
    }

    if (loop == LOOP_CACHING_WAIT && ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg)
      go search again;

In my earlier fix we were trying to allocate from the block group, but
we weren't waiting for the progress because we were only waiting for the
free space to be >= the amount of free space we wanted.  My fix made it
so we waited for forward progress to be made as well, so we would be
sure to wait.

This time however we did not have a block group that matched our size
class, so what was happening was this

  find_free_extent
    for_each_block_group {
      ffe_ctl->cached == btrfs_block_group_cache_done(bg)
      if (!ffe_ctl->cached)
ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg = true;
      if (size_class_doesn't_match())
goto loop;
      do_allocation()
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress();
  loop:
      release_block_group(block_group);
    }

    if (loop == LOOP_CACHING_WAIT && ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg)
      go search again;

The size_class_doesn't_match() part was true, so we'd just skip this
block group and never wait for caching, and then because we found a
caching block group we'd just go back and do the loop again.  We never
sleep and thus never flush the plug and we have the same deadlock.

Fix the logic for waiting on the block group caching to instead do it
unconditionally when we goto loop.  This takes the logic out of the
allocation step, so now the loop looks more like this

  find_free_extent
    for_each_block_group {
      ffe_ctl->cached == btrfs_block_group_cache_done(bg)
      if (!ffe_ctl->cached)
ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg = true;
      if (size_class_doesn't_match())
goto loop;
      do_allocation()
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress();
  loop:
      if (loop > LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT && !ffe_ctl->retry_uncached &&
  !ffe_ctl->cached) {
 ffe_ctl->retry_uncached = true;
 btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress();
      }

      release_block_group(block_group);
    }

    if (loop == LOOP_CACHING_WAIT && ffe_ctl->have_caching_bg)
      go search again;

This simplifies the logic a lot, and makes sure that if we're hitting
uncached block groups we're always waiting on them at some point.

I ran this through 100 iterations of generic/475, as this particular
case was harder to hit than the previous one.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head
Ruan Jinjie [Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:00:22 +0000 (11:00 +0800)]
btrfs: use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head

Use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head instead of open-coding it.

Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: handle errors properly in update_inline_extent_backref()
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 9 Aug 2023 07:08:21 +0000 (15:08 +0800)]
btrfs: handle errors properly in update_inline_extent_backref()

[PROBLEM]
Inside function update_inline_extent_backref(), we have several
BUG_ON()s along with some ASSERT()s which can be triggered by corrupted
filesystem.

[ANAYLYSE]
Most of those BUG_ON()s and ASSERT()s are just a way of handling
unexpected on-disk data.

Although we have tree-checker to rule out obviously incorrect extent
tree blocks, it's not enough for these ones.  Thus we need proper error
handling for them.

[FIX]
Thankfully all the callers of update_inline_extent_backref() would
eventually handle the errror by aborting the current transaction.
So this patch would do the proper error handling by:

- Make update_inline_extent_backref() to return int
  The return value would be either 0 or -EUCLEAN.

- Replace BUG_ON()s and ASSERT()s with proper error handling
  This includes:
  * Dump the bad extent tree leaf
  * Output an error message for the cause
    This would include the extent bytenr, num_bytes (if needed), the bad
    values and expected good values.
  * Return -EUCLEAN

  Note here we remove all the WARN_ON()s, as eventually the transaction
  would be aborted, thus a backtrace would be triggered anyway.

- Better comments on why we expect refs == 1 and refs_to_mode == -1 for
  tree blocks

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: re-enable metadata over-commit for zoned mode
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:40 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: re-enable metadata over-commit for zoned mode

Now that, we can re-enable metadata over-commit. As we moved the activation
from the reservation time to the write time, we no longer need to ensure
all the reserved bytes is properly activated.

Without the metadata over-commit, it suffers from lower performance because
it needs to flush the delalloc items more often and allocate more block
groups. Re-enabling metadata over-commit will solve the issue.

Fixes: 79417d040f4f ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: don't activate non-DATA BG on allocation
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:39 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: don't activate non-DATA BG on allocation

Now that a non-DATA block group is activated at write time, don't
activate it on allocation time.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: no longer count fresh BG region as zone unusable
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:38 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: no longer count fresh BG region as zone unusable

Now that we switched to write time activation, we no longer need to (and
must not) count the fresh region as zone unusable. This commit is similar
to revert of commit fa2068d7e922b434eb ("btrfs: zoned: count fresh BG
region as zone unusable").

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: activate metadata block group on write time
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:37 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: activate metadata block group on write time

In the current implementation, block groups are activated at reservation
time to ensure that all reserved bytes can be written to an active metadata
block group. However, this approach has proven to be less efficient, as it
activates block groups more frequently than necessary, putting pressure on
the active zone resource and leading to potential issues such as early
ENOSPC or hung_task.

Another drawback of the current method is that it hampers metadata
over-commit, and necessitates additional flush operations and block group
allocations, resulting in decreased overall performance.

To address these issues, this commit introduces a write-time activation of
metadata and system block group. This involves reserving at least one
active block group specifically for a metadata and system block group.

Since metadata write-out is always allocated sequentially, when we need to
write to a non-active block group, we can wait for the ongoing IOs to
complete, activate a new block group, and then proceed with writing to the
new block group.

Fixes: b09315139136 ("btrfs: zoned: activate metadata block group on flush_space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: reserve zones for an active metadata/system block group
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:36 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: reserve zones for an active metadata/system block group

Ensure a metadata and system block group can be activated on write time, by
leaving a certain number of active zones when trying to activate a data
block group.

Zones for two metadata block groups (normal and tree-log) and one system
block group are reserved, according to the profile type: two zones per
block group on the DUP profile and one zone per block group otherwise.

The reservation must be freed once a non-data block group is allocated. If
not, we over-reserve the active zones and data block group activation will
suffer. For the dynamic reservation count, we need to manage the
reservation count per device.

The reservation count variable is protected by
fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock.

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: update meta write pointer on zone finish
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:35 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: update meta write pointer on zone finish

On finishing a zone, the meta_write_pointer should be set of the end of the
zone to reflect the actual write pointer position.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: defer advancing meta write pointer
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:34 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: defer advancing meta write pointer

We currently advance the meta_write_pointer in
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer(). That makes it necessary to revert it
when locking the buffer failed. Instead, we can advance it just before
sending the buffer.

Also, this is necessary for the following commit. In the commit, it needs
to release the zoned_meta_io_lock to allow IOs to come in and wait for them
to fill the currently active block group. If we advance the
meta_write_pointer before locking the extent buffer, the following extent
buffer can pass the meta_write_pointer check, resulting in an unaligned
write failure.

Advancing the pointer is still thread-safe as the extent buffer is locked.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: return int from btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:33 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: return int from btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer

Now that we have writeback_control passed to
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer(), we can move the wbc condition in
submit_eb_page() to btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer() and return int.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: zoned: introduce block group context to btrfs_eb_write_context
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:32 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: introduce block group context to btrfs_eb_write_context

For metadata write out on the zoned mode, we call
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer() to check if an extent buffer to be written
is aligned to the write pointer.

We look up a block group containing the extent buffer for every extent
buffer, which takes unnecessary effort as the writing extent buffers are
mostly contiguous.

Introduce "zoned_bg" to cache the block group working on.  Also, while
at it, rename "cache" to "block_group".

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: introduce struct to consolidate extent buffer write context
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:12:31 +0000 (01:12 +0900)]
btrfs: introduce struct to consolidate extent buffer write context

Introduce btrfs_eb_write_context to consolidate writeback_control and the
exntent buffer context.  This will help adding a block group context as
well.

While at it, move the eb context setting before
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer(). We can set it here because we anyway need
to skip pages in the same eb if that eb is rejected by
btrfs_check_meta_write_pointer().

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: avoid start and commit empty transaction when flushing qgroups
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:13 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid start and commit empty transaction when flushing qgroups

When flushing qgroups, we try to join a running transaction, with
btrfs_join_transaction(), and then commit the transaction. However using
btrfs_join_transaction() will result in creating a new transaction in case
there isn't any running or if there's an existing one already committing.
This is pointless as we only need to attach to an existing one that is
not committing and in case there's an existing one committing, wait for
its commit to complete. Creating and committing an empty transaction is
wasteful, pointless IO and unnecessary rotation of the backup roots.

So use btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() instead, to avoid creating and
committing empty transactions.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: avoid start and commit empty transaction when starting qgroup rescan
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:12 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid start and commit empty transaction when starting qgroup rescan

When starting a qgroup rescan, we try to join a running transaction, with
btrfs_join_transaction(), and then commit the transaction. However using
btrfs_join_transaction() will result in creating a new transaction in case
there isn't any running or if there's an existing one already committing.
This is pointless as we only need to attach to an existing one that is
not committing and in case there's an existing one committing, wait for
its commit to complete. Creating and committing an empty transaction is
wasteful, pointless IO and unnecessary rotation of the backup roots.

So use btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() instead, to avoid creating and
committing empty transactions.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: avoid starting and committing empty transaction when flushing space
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:11 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid starting and committing empty transaction when flushing space

When flushing space and we are in the COMMIT_TRANS state, we join a
transaction with btrfs_join_transaction() and then commit the returned
transaction. However btrfs_join_transaction() starts a new transaction if
there is none currently open, which is pointless since comitting a new,
empty transaction, doesn't achieve anything, it only wastes time, IO and
creates an unnecessary rotation of the backup roots.

So use btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() to avoid starting a new
transaction. This also waits for any ongoing transaction that is
committing (state >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING) to fully complete, and
therefore wait for all the extents that were pinned during the
transaction's lifetime to be unpinned.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: avoid starting new transaction when flushing delayed items and refs
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:10 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid starting new transaction when flushing delayed items and refs

When flushing space we join a transaction to flush delayed items and
delayed references, in order to try to release space. However using
btrfs_join_transaction() not only joins an existing transaction as well
as it starts a new transaction if there is none open. If there is no
transaction open, we don't have neither delayed items nor delayed
references, so creating a new transaction is a waste of time, IO and
creates an unnecessary rotation of the backup roots without gaining any
benefits (including releasing space).

So use btrfs_join_transaction_nostart() when attempting to flush delayed
items and references.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: merge find_free_dev_extent() and find_free_dev_extent_start()
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:09 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: merge find_free_dev_extent() and find_free_dev_extent_start()

There is no point in having find_free_dev_extent() because it's just a
simple wrapper around find_free_dev_extent_start() which always passes a
value of 0 for the search_start argument. Since there are no other callers
of find_free_dev_extent_start(), remove find_free_dev_extent() and rename
find_free_dev_extent_start() to find_free_dev_extent(), removing its
search_start argument because it's always 0.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: make find_free_dev_extent() static
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:08 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: make find_free_dev_extent() static

The function find_free_dev_extent() is only used within volumes.c, so make
it static and remove its prototype from volumes.h.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() static
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:07 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() static

btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() is not used outside disk-io.c, so make it static,
remove its prototype from disk-io.h and move its definition above the
where it's used in disk-io.c

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: fail priority metadata ticket with real fs error
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:06 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: fail priority metadata ticket with real fs error

At priority_reclaim_metadata_space(), if we were not able to satisfy the
the ticket after going through the various flushing states and we notice
the fs went into an error state, likely due to a transaction abort during
the flushing, set the ticket's error to the error that caused the
transaction abort instead of an unconditional -EROFS.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: return real error when orphan cleanup fails due to a transaction abort
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:05 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: return real error when orphan cleanup fails due to a transaction abort

During mount we will call btrfs_orphan_cleanup() to remove any inodes that
were previously deleted (have a link count of 0) but for which we were not
able before to remove their items from the subvolume tree. The removal of
the items will happen by triggering eviction, when we do the final iput()
on them at btrfs_orphan_cleanup(), which will end in the loop at
btrfs_evict_inode() that truncates inode items.

In a dire situation we may have a transaction abort due to -ENOSPC when
attempting to truncate the inode items, and in that case the orphan item
(key type BTRFS_ORPHAN_ITEM_KEY) will remain in the subvolume tree and
when we hit the next iteration of the while loop at btrfs_orphan_cleanup()
we will find the same orphan item as before, and then we will return
-EINVAL from btrfs_orphan_cleanup() through the following if statement:

    if (found_key.offset == last_objectid) {
       btrfs_err(fs_info,
                 "Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup");
       ret = -EINVAL;
       goto out;
    }

This makes the mount operation fail with -EINVAL, when it should have been
-ENOSPC. This is confusing because -EINVAL might lead a user into thinking
it provided invalid mount options for example.

An example where this happens:

   $ mount test.img /mnt
   mount: /mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.

   $ dmesg
   [ 2542.356934] BTRFS: device fsid 977fff75-1181-4d2b-a739-384fa710d16e devid 1 transid 47409973 /dev/loop0 scanned by mount (4459)
   [ 2542.357451] BTRFS info (device loop0): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm
   [ 2542.357461] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
   [ 2542.742287] BTRFS info (device loop0): auto enabling async discard
   [ 2542.764554] BTRFS info (device loop0): checking UUID tree
   [ 2551.743065] ------------[ cut here ]------------
   [ 2551.743068] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
   [ 2551.743149] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 215 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3494 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x397/0x3d0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743311] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...)
   [ 2551.743353] CPU: 7 PID: 215 Comm: kworker/u24:5 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
   [ 2551.743356] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
   [ 2551.743357] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743405] RIP: 0010:btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x397/0x3d0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743449] Code: 8b 43 0c (...)
   [ 2551.743451] RSP: 0018:ffff982c005a7c40 EFLAGS: 00010286
   [ 2551.743452] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88fc6e44b400 RCX: 0000000000000000
   [ 2551.743453] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff8dff0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
   [ 2551.743454] RBP: ffff88fc51817208 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff982c005a7ae0
   [ 2551.743455] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88fc43d2e570
   [ 2551.743456] R13: ffff88fc43d2e400 R14: ffff88fc8fb08ee0 R15: ffff88fc6e44b530
   [ 2551.743457] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff89035fbc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
   [ 2551.743458] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
   [ 2551.743459] CR2: 00007fa8cdf2f6f4 CR3: 0000000124850003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
   [ 2551.743462] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
   [ 2551.743463] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
   [ 2551.743464] Call Trace:
   [ 2551.743472]  <TASK>
   [ 2551.743474]  ? __warn+0x80/0x130
   [ 2551.743478]  ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x397/0x3d0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743520]  ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
   [ 2551.743523]  ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
   [ 2551.743526]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
   [ 2551.743528]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
   [ 2551.743532]  ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x397/0x3d0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743574]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
   [ 2551.743576]  ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1bd/0x200 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743609]  commit_cowonly_roots+0x1e9/0x260 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743652]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x42e/0xfa0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743693]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
   [ 2551.743697]  flush_space+0xf1/0x5d0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743743]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
   [ 2551.743745]  ? finish_task_switch+0x91/0x2a0
   [ 2551.743748]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
   [ 2551.743750]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0xc9/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743793]  btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0xe1/0x230 [btrfs]
   [ 2551.743837]  process_one_work+0x1d9/0x3e0
   [ 2551.743844]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3b0
   [ 2551.743847]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
   [ 2551.743849]  kthread+0xee/0x120
   [ 2551.743852]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
   [ 2551.743854]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
   [ 2551.743860]  </TASK>
   [ 2551.743861] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
   [ 2551.743863] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): dumping space info:
   [ 2551.743866] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info DATA has 126976 free, is full
   [ 2551.743868] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info total=13458472960, used=13458137088, pinned=143360, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=65536 zone_unusable=0
   [ 2551.743870] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info METADATA has -51625984 free, is full
   [ 2551.743872] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info total=771751936, used=770146304, pinned=1605632, reserved=0, may_use=51625984, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0
   [ 2551.743874] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info SYSTEM has 14663680 free, is not full
   [ 2551.743875] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): space_info total=14680064, used=16384, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0
   [ 2551.743877] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): global_block_rsv: size 53231616 reserved 51544064
   [ 2551.743878] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
   [ 2551.743879] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
   [ 2551.743880] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
   [ 2551.743881] BTRFS info (device loop0: state A): delayed_refs_rsv: size 786432 reserved 0
   [ 2551.743886] BTRFS: error (device loop0: state A) in btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups:3494: errno=-28 No space left
   [ 2551.743911] BTRFS info (device loop0: state EA): forced readonly
   [ 2551.743951] BTRFS warning (device loop0: state EA): could not allocate space for delete; will truncate on mount
   [ 2551.743962] BTRFS error (device loop0: state EA): Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup
   [ 2551.743973] BTRFS warning (device loop0: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
   [ 2551.743989] BTRFS error (device loop0: state EA): could not do orphan cleanup -22

So make the btrfs_orphan_cleanup() return the value of BTRFS_FS_ERROR(),
if it's set, and -EINVAL otherwise.

For that same example, after this change, the mount operation fails with
-ENOSPC:

   $ mount test.img /mnt
   mount: /mnt: mount(2) system call failed: No space left on device.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: store the error that turned the fs into error state
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:04 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: store the error that turned the fs into error state

Currently when we turn the fs into an error state, typically after a
transaction abort, we don't store the error anywhere, we just set a bit
(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR) at struct btrfs_fs_info::fs_state to signal the
error state.

There are cases where it would be useful to have access to the specific
error in order to provide a more meaningful error to users/applications.
This change adds a member to struct btrfs_fs_info to store the error and
removes the BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR bit. When there's no error, the new
member (fs_error) has a value of 0, otherwise its value is a negative
errno value.

Followup changes will make use of this new member.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't steal space from global rsv after a transaction abort
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:03 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: don't steal space from global rsv after a transaction abort

When doing a priority metadata space reclaim, while we are going through
the flush states and running their respective operations, it's possible
that a transaction abort happened, for example when running delayed refs
we hit -ENOSPC or in the critical section of transaction commit we failed
with -ENOSPC or some other error. In these cases a transaction was aborted
and the fs turned into error state. If that happened, then it makes no
sense to steal from the global block reserve and return success to the
caller if the stealing was successful - the caller will later get an
error when attempting to modify the fs. Instead make the ticket fail if
we have the fs in error state and don't attempt to steal from the global
rsv, as it's not only it's pointless, it also simplifies debugging some
-ENOSPC problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: print available space across all block groups when dumping space info
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:02 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: print available space across all block groups when dumping space info

When dumping a space info also sum the available space for all block
groups and then print it. This often useful for debugging -ENOSPC
related problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:01 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info

When dumping a space info, we iterate over all its block groups and then
print their size and the amounts of bytes used, reserved, pinned, etc.
When debugging -ENOSPC problems it's also useful to know how much space
is available (free), so calculate that and print it as well.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: print block group super and delalloc bytes when dumping space info
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:57:00 +0000 (16:57 +0100)]
btrfs: print block group super and delalloc bytes when dumping space info

When dumping a space info's block groups, also print the number of bytes
used for super blocks and delalloc. This is often useful for debugging
-ENOSPC problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: print target number of bytes when dumping free space
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:56:59 +0000 (16:56 +0100)]
btrfs: print target number of bytes when dumping free space

When dumping free space, with btrfs_dump_free_space(), we pass a bytes
argument in order to count how many free space entries in the block group
have a size greater than or equal to that number of bytes. We then print
how many suitable entries we found, but we don't print the target number
of bytes, we just say "bytes". Change the message to actually print the
number of bytes, which makes debugging -ENOSPC issues a bit easier.

Also sligthly change the odd grammar and terminology: the sentence is
ending with 'is', which doesn't make sense, and the term 'blocks' is
confusing as we are referring to free space entries within the block
group's free space cache.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: update comment for btrfs_join_transaction_nostart()
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:56:58 +0000 (16:56 +0100)]
btrfs: update comment for btrfs_join_transaction_nostart()

Update the comment for btrfs_join_transaction_nostart() to be more clear
about how it works and how it's different from btrfs_attach_transaction().

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't start transaction when joining with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART
Filipe Manana [Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:56:57 +0000 (16:56 +0100)]
btrfs: don't start transaction when joining with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART

When joining a transaction with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART, if we don't find a
running transaction we end up creating one. This goes against the purpose
of TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART which is to join a running transaction if its state
is at or below the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, otherwise return an
-ENOENT error and don't start a new transaction. So fix this to not create
a new transaction if there's no running transaction at or below that
state.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Fixes: a6d155d2e363 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap and transaction commits")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: refactor main loop in memmove_extent_buffer()
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:34 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: refactor main loop in memmove_extent_buffer()

[BACKGROUND]
Currently memove_extent_buffer() does a loop where it strop at any page
boundary inside [dst_offset, dst_offset + len) or [src_offset,
src_offset + len).

This is mostly allowing us to do copy_pages(), but if we're going to use
folios we will need to handle multi-page (the old behavior) or single
folio (the new optimization).

The current code would be a burden for future changes.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of sticking with copy_pages(), here we utilize the new
__write_extent_buffer() helper to handle the writes.

Unlike the refactoring in memcpy_extent_buffer(), we can not just rely
on the write_extent_buffer() and only handle page boundaries inside src
range.

The function write_extent_buffer() itself is still doing forward
writing, thus it cannot handle the following case: (already in the
extent buffer memory operation tests, cross page overlapping run 2)

Src Page boundary
|///////|
    |///|////|
    Dst

In the above case, if we just follow page boundary in the src range, we
have no need to do any split, just one __write_extent_buffer() with
use_memmove = true.

But __write_extent_buffer() would split the dst range into two,
so it first copies the beginning part of the src range into the first half
of the dst range.
After this operation, the beginning of the dst range is already updated,
causing corruption.

So we have to follow the old behavior of handling both page boundaries.

And since we're the last caller of copy_pages(), we can remove it
completely.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: refactor main loop in memcpy_extent_buffer()
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:33 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: refactor main loop in memcpy_extent_buffer()

[BACKGROUND]
Currently memcpy_extent_buffer() does a loop where it would stop at
any page boundary inside [dst_offset, dst_offset + len) or [src_offset,
src_offset + len).

This is mostly allowing us to do copy_pages(), but if we're going to use
folios we will need to handle multi-page (the old behavior) or single
folio (the new optimization).

The current code would be a burden for future changes.

[ENHANCEMENT]
There is a hidden pitfall of the naming memcpy_extent_buffer(), unlike
regular memcpy(), this function can handle overlapping ranges.

So here we extract write_extent_buffer() into a new internal helper,
__write_extent_buffer(), and add a new parameter @use_memmove, to
indicate whether we should use memmove() or regular memcpy().

Now we can go __write_extent_buffer() to handle writing into the dst
range, with proper overlapping detection.

This has a tiny change to the chance of calling memmove().
As the split only happens at the source range page boundaries, the
memcpy/memmove() range would be slightly larger than the old code,
thus slightly increase the chance we call memmove() other than memcopy().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: copy all pages at once at the end of btrfs_clone_extent_buffer()
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:32 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: copy all pages at once at the end of btrfs_clone_extent_buffer()

btrfs_clone_extent_buffer() calls copy_page() at each iteration but we
can copy all pages at the end in one go if there were no errors.
This would make later conversion to folios easier.

Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: refactor main loop in copy_extent_buffer_full()
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:31 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: refactor main loop in copy_extent_buffer_full()

[BACKGROUND]
copy_extent_buffer_full() currently does different handling for regular
and subpage cases, for regular cases it does a page by page copying.
For subpage cases, it just copies the content.

This is fine for the page based extent buffer code, but for the incoming
folio conversion, it can be a burden to add a new branch just to handle
all the different combinations (subpage vs regular, one single folio vs
multi pages).

[ENHANCE]
Instead of handling the different combinations, just go one single
handling for all cases, utilizing write_extent_buffer() to do the
copying.

Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: use write_extent_buffer() to implement write_extent_buffer_*id()
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:30 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: use write_extent_buffer() to implement write_extent_buffer_*id()

Helpers write_extent_buffer_chunk_tree_uuid() and
write_extent_buffer_fsid(), they can be implemented by
write_extent_buffer().

These two helpers are not that frequently used, they only get called
during initialization of a new tree block.  There is not much need for
those slightly optimized versions.  And since they can be easily
converted to one write_extent_buffer() call, define them as inline
helpers.

This would make later page/folio switch much easier, as all change only
need to happen in write_extent_buffer().

Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: refactor extent buffer bitmaps operations
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:29 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: refactor extent buffer bitmaps operations

[BACKGROUND]
Currently we handle extent bitmaps manually in
extent_buffer_bitmap_set() and extent_buffer_bitmap_clear().

Although with various helpers like eb_bitmap_offset() it's still a little
messy to read.  The code seems to be a copy of bitmap_set(), but with
all the cross-page handling embedded into the code.

[ENHANCEMENT]
This patch would enhance the readability by introducing two helpers:

- memset_extent_buffer()
  To handle the byte aligned range, thus all the cross-page handling is
  done there.

- extent_buffer_get_byte()
  This for the first and the last byte operations, which only need to
  grab one byte, thus no need for any cross-page handling.

So we can split both extent_buffer_bitmap_set() and
extent_buffer_bitmap_clear() into 3 parts:

- Handle the first byte
  If the range fits inside the first byte, we can exit early.

- Handle the byte aligned part
  This is the part which can have cross-page operations, and it would
  be handled by memset_extent_buffer().

- Handle the last byte

This refactoring does not only make the code a little easier to read,
but also makes later folio/page switch much easier, as the switch only
needs to be done inside memset_extent_buffer() and extent_buffer_get_byte().

Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: tests: add self tests for extent buffer memory operations
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:28 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: tests: add self tests for extent buffer memory operations

The new self tests would populate a memory range with random bytes, then
copy it to the extent buffer, so that we can verify if the extent buffer
memory operation and memmove()/memcopy() are resulting the same
contents.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: tests: enhance extent buffer bitmap tests
Qu Wenruo [Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:08:27 +0000 (19:08 +0800)]
btrfs: tests: enhance extent buffer bitmap tests

Enhance extent bitmap tests for the following aspects:

- Remove unnecessary @len from __test_eb_bitmaps()
  We can fetch the length from extent buffer

- Explicitly distinguish bit and byte length
  Now every start/len inside bitmap tests would have either "byte_" or
  "bit_" prefix to make it more explicit.

- Better error reporting

  If we have mismatch bits, the error report would dump the following
  contents:

  * start bytenr
  * bit number
  * the full byte from bitmap
  * the full byte from the extent

  This is to save developers time so obvious problem can be found
  immediately

- Extract bitmap set/clear and check operation into two helpers
  This is to save some code lines, as we will have more tests to do.

- Add new tests

  The following tests are added, mostly for the incoming extent bitmap
  accessor refactoring:

  * Set bits inside the same byte
  * Clear bits inside the same byte
  * Cross byte boundary set
  * Cross byte boundary clear
  * Cross multi-byte boundary set
  * Cross multi-byte boundary clear

  Those new tests have already saved my backend for the incoming extent
  buffer bitmap refactoring.

Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: move comments to btrfs_loop_type definition
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:12:15 +0000 (16:12 -0400)]
btrfs: move comments to btrfs_loop_type definition

Some of these loop types aren't described, and they should be with the
definitions to make it easier to tell what each of them do.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: print name and pid when device scanning processes race
Anand Jain [Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:53:03 +0000 (21:53 +0800)]
btrfs: print name and pid when device scanning processes race

There is a race between systemd and mount, as both of them try to register
the device in the kernel. When systemd loses the race, it prints the
following message:

  BTRFS error: device /dev/sdb7 belongs to fsid 1b3bacbf-14db-49c9-a3ef-547998aacc4e, and the fs is already mounted.

The 'btrfs dev scan' registers one device at a time, so there is no way
for the mount thread to wait in the kernel for all the devices to have
registered as it won't know if all the devices are discovered.

For now, improve the error log by printing the command name and process
ID along with the error message.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agomm: remove folio_account_redirty
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:44 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
mm: remove folio_account_redirty

Fold folio_account_redirty into folio_redirty_for_writepage now
that all other users except for the also unused account_page_redirty
wrapper are gone.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: fix zoned handling in submit_uncompressed_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:43 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: fix zoned handling in submit_uncompressed_range

For zoned file systems we need to use run_delalloc_zoned to submit
writeback, as we need to write out partial allocations when running into
zone active limits.

submit_uncompressed_range currently always calls cow_file_range to
allocate blocks and thus misses the active zone limits handling.  Fix
this by passing the pages_dirty argument to run_delalloc_zoned and always
using it from submit_uncompressed_range as it does the right thing for
zoned and non-zoned file systems.

To account for the fact that run_delalloc_zoned is now also used for
non-zoned file systems rename it to run_delalloc_cow, and add comment
describing it.

Fixes: 42c011000963 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce dedicated data write path for zoned filesystems")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't redirty locked_page in run_delalloc_zoned
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:42 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: don't redirty locked_page in run_delalloc_zoned

extent_write_locked_range currently expects that either all or no
pages are dirty when it is called.  Bur run_delalloc_zoned is called
directly in the writepages path, and has the dirty bit cleared only
for locked_page and which the extent_write_cache_pages currently
operates.  It currently works around this by redirtying locked_page,
but that is a bit inefficient and cumbersome.  Pass a locked_page
argument to run_delalloc_zoned so that clearing the dirty bit can
be skipped on just that page.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: refactor the zoned device handling in cow_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:41 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: refactor the zoned device handling in cow_file_range

Handling of the done_offset to cow_file_range is a bit confusing, as
it is not updated at all when the function succeeds, and the -EAGAIN
status is used bother for the case where we need to wait for a zone
finish and the one where the allocation was partially successful.

Change the calling convention so that done_offset is always updated,
and 0 is returned if some allocation was successful (partial allocation
can still only happen for zoned devices), and waiting for a zone
finish is done internally in cow_file_range instead of the caller.

Also write a comment explaining the logic.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't redirty pages in compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:40 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: don't redirty pages in compress_file_range

compress_file_range needs to clear the dirty bit before handing off work
to the compression worker threads to prevent processes coming in through
mmap and changing the file contents while the compression is accessing
the data (See commit 4adaa611020f ("Btrfs: fix race between mmap writes
and compression").

But when compress_file_range decides to not compress the data, it falls
back to submit_uncompressed_range which uses extent_write_locked_range
to write the uncompressed data.  extent_write_locked_range currently
expects all pages to be marked dirty so that it can clear the dirty
bit itself, and thus compress_file_range has to redirty the page range.

Redirtying the page range is rather inefficient and also pointless,
so instead pass a pages_dirty parameter to extent_write_locked_range
and skip the redirty game entirely.

Note that compress_file_range was even redirtying the locked_page twice
given that extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io already redirties all pages
in the range, which must include locked_page if there is one.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: share the code to free the page array in compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:39 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: share the code to free the page array in compress_file_range

compress_file_range has two code blocks to free the page array for the
compressed data.  Share the code using a goto label.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: use a separate label for the incompressible case in compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:38 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: use a separate label for the incompressible case in compress_file_range

compress_file_range can fail to compress either because of resource or
alignment constraints or because the data is incompressible.  In the latter
case the inode is marked so that compression isn't tried again.  Currently
that check is based on the condition that the pages array has been allocated
which is rather cryptic.  Use a separate label to clearly distinguish this
case.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: further simplify the compress or not logic in compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:37 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: further simplify the compress or not logic in compress_file_range

Currently the logic whether to compress or not in compress_file_range is
a bit convoluted because it tries to share code for creating inline
extents for the compressible [1] path and the bail to uncompressed path.

But the latter isn't needed at all, because cow_file_range as called by
submit_uncompressed_range will already create inline extents as needed,
so there is no need to have special handling for it if we can live with
the fact that it will be called a bit later in the ->ordered_func of the
workqueue instead of right now.

[1] there is undocumented logic that creates an uncompressed inline
extent outside of the shall not compress logic if total_in is too small.
This logic isn't explained in comments or any commit log I could find,
so I've preserved it.  Documentation explaining it would be appreciated
if anyone understands this code.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: streamline compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:36 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: streamline compress_file_range

Reorder compress_file_range so that the main compression flow happens
straight line and not in branches.  To do this ensure that pages is
always zeroed before a page allocation happens, which allows the
cleanup_and_bail_uncompressed label to clean up the page allocations
as needed.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: merge submit_compressed_extents and async_cow_submit
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:35 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: merge submit_compressed_extents and async_cow_submit

The code in submit_compressed_extents just loops over the async_extents,
and doesn't need to be conditional on an inode being present, as there
won't be any async_extent in the list if we created and inline extent.
Merge the two functions to simplify the logic.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: merge async_cow_start and compress_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:34 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: merge async_cow_start and compress_file_range

There is no good reason to have the simple async_cow_start wrapper,
merge the argument conversion into the main compress_file_range function.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't clear async_chunk->inode in async_cow_start
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:33 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: don't clear async_chunk->inode in async_cow_start

Now that the ->inode check isn't needed in submit_compressed_extents
any more, there is no reason to clear the field early.  Always keep
the inode around until the work item is finished and remove the special
casing, and the counting of compressed extents in compress_file_range.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: clean up the check for uncompressed ranges in submit_one_async_extent
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:32 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: clean up the check for uncompressed ranges in submit_one_async_extent

Instead of checking for a NULL !pages and explaining this with a cryptic
comment, just check the compression type for BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE to make
the check self-explanatory.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: reduce the number of arguments to btrfs_run_delalloc_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:31 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: reduce the number of arguments to btrfs_run_delalloc_range

Instead of a separate page_started argument that tells the callers that
btrfs_run_delalloc_range already started writeback by itself, overload
the return value with a positive 1 in additio to 0 and a negative error
code to indicate that is has already started writeback, and remove the
nr_written argument as that caller can calculate it directly based on
the range, and in fact already does so for the case where writeback
wasn't started yet.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: improve the delalloc_to_write calculation in writepage_delalloc
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:30 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: improve the delalloc_to_write calculation in writepage_delalloc

Currently writepage_delalloc adds to delalloc_to_write in every loop
operation.  That is not only more work than doing it once after the
loop, but can also over-increment the counter due to rounding errors
when a new loop iteration starts with an offset into a page.

Add a new page_start variable instead of recaculation that value over
and over, move the delalloc_to_write calculation out of the loop, use
the DIV_ROUND_UP helper instead of open coding it and remove the pointless
found local variable.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove the return value from extent_write_locked_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:29 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: remove the return value from extent_write_locked_range

The return value from extent_write_locked_range is ignored, and that's
fine because the error reporting happens through the mapping and
ordered_extent.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove the return value from submit_uncompressed_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:28 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: remove the return value from submit_uncompressed_range

The return value from submit_uncompressed_range is ignored, and that's
fine because the error reporting happens through the mapping and
ordered_extent.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: reduce debug spam from submit_compressed_extents
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:27 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: reduce debug spam from submit_compressed_extents

Move the printk that is supposed to help to debug failures in
submit_one_async_extent into submit_one_async_extent and make it
coniditonal on actually having an error condition instead of spamming
the log unconditionally.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove end_extent_writepage
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:26 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: remove end_extent_writepage

end_extent_writepage is a small helper that combines a call to
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished with conditional error-only calls to
btrfs_page_clear_uptodate and mapping_set_error with a somewhat
unfortunate calling convention that passes and inclusive end instead
of the len expected by the underlying functions.

Remove end_extent_writepage and open code it in the 4 callers. Out
of those two already are error-only and thus don't need the extra
conditional, and one already has the mapping_set_error, so a duplicate
call can be avoided.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:25 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: remove btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered

btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered is a small wrapper around
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished that just changs the argument passing
slightly, and adds a tracepoint.

Move the tracpoint to btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished, which means
it now also covers the error handling in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extent
and switch all callers to just call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished
directly.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: split page locking out of __process_pages_contig
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:24 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: split page locking out of __process_pages_contig

There is a lot of complexity in __process_pages_contig to deal with the
PAGE_LOCK case that can return an error unlike all the other actions.

Open code the page iteration for page locking in lock_delalloc_pages and
remove all the now unused code from __process_pages_contig.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: don't create inline extents in fallback_to_cow
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:23 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: don't create inline extents in fallback_to_cow

For NOCOW files, run_delalloc_nocow can still fall back to COW
allocations when required and calls to fallback_to_cow helper for
that.  For such an allocation we can have multiple ordered_extents
for existing extents that NOCOW overwrites and new allocations that
fallback_to_cow creates.  If one of the new extents is an inline
extent, the writepages could would have to avoid normal page writeback
for them as indicated by the page_started return argument, which
run_delalloc_nocow can't return.   Fix this by never creating inline
extents from fallback_to_cow.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: pass a flags argument to cow_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:22 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
btrfs: pass a flags argument to cow_file_range

The int used as bool unlock is not a very good way to describe the
behavior, and the next patch will have to add another behavior modifier.
We'll do that by two bool parameters instead of adding bit flags.  Now
specifies that the pages should always be kept locked.  This is the
inverse of the old unlock argument.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ switch flags to bool ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free
Boris Burkov [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:02:07 +0000 (09:02 -0700)]
btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free

btrfs_start_transaction reserves metadata space of the PERTRANS type
before it identifies a transaction to start/join. This allows flushing
when reserving that space without a deadlock. However, it results in a
race which temporarily breaks qgroup rsv accounting.

T1                                              T2
start_transaction
do_stuff
                                            start_transaction
                                                qgroup_reserve_meta_pertrans
commit_transaction
    qgroup_free_meta_all_pertrans
                                            hit an error starting txn
                                            goto reserve_fail
                                            qgroup_free_meta_pertrans (already freed!)

The basic issue is that there is nothing preventing another commit from
committing before start_transaction finishes (in fact sometimes we
intentionally wait for it) so any error path that frees the reserve is
at risk of this race.

While this exact space was getting freed anyway, and it's not a huge
deal to double free it (just a warning, the free code catches this), it
can result in incorrectly freeing some other pertrans reservation in
this same reservation, which could then lead to spuriously granting
reservations we might not have the space for. Therefore, I do believe it
is worth fixing.

To fix it, use the existing prealloc->pertrans conversion mechanism.
When we first reserve the space, we reserve prealloc space and only when
we are sure we have a transaction do we convert it to pertrans. This way
any racing commits do not blow away our reservation, but we still get a
pertrans reservation that is freed when _this_ transaction gets committed.

This issue can be reproduced by running generic/269 with either qgroups
or squotas enabled via mkfs on the scratch device.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: free qgroup rsv on io failure
Boris Burkov [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:02:06 +0000 (09:02 -0700)]
btrfs: free qgroup rsv on io failure

If we do a write whose bio suffers an error, we will never reclaim the
qgroup reserved space for it. We allocate the space in the write_iter
codepath, then release the reservation as we allocate the ordered
extent, but we only create a delayed ref if the ordered extent finishes.
If it has an error, we simply leak the rsv. This is apparent in running
any error injecting (dmerror) fstests like btrfs/146 or btrfs/160. Such
tests fail due to dmesg on umount complaining about the leaked qgroup
data space.

When we clean up other aspects of space on failed ordered_extents, also
free the qgroup rsv.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: remove duplicate free_async_extent_pages() on reservation error
Goldwyn Rodrigues [Fri, 14 Jul 2023 15:18:19 +0000 (10:18 -0500)]
btrfs: remove duplicate free_async_extent_pages() on reservation error

While performing compressed writes, if the extent reservation fails, the
async extent pages are first freed in the error check for return value
ret, and then again at out_free label.

Remove the first call to free_async_extent_pages().

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: move eb subpage preallocation out of the loop
Qu Wenruo [Sun, 9 Jul 2023 07:08:18 +0000 (15:08 +0800)]
btrfs: move eb subpage preallocation out of the loop

Initially we preallocate btrfs_subpage structure in the main loop of
alloc_extent_buffer().

But later commit fbca46eb46ec ("btrfs: make nodesize >= PAGE_SIZE case
to reuse the non-subpage routine") has made sure we only go subpage
routine if our nodesize is smaller than PAGE_SIZE.

This means for that case, we only need to allocate the subpage structure
once anyway.

So this patch would make the preallocation out of the main loop.  This
would slightly reduce the workload when we hold the page lock, and make
code a little easier to read.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: simplify the no-bioc fast path condition in btrfs_map_block
Christoph Hellwig [Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:13:24 +0000 (08:13 +0200)]
btrfs: simplify the no-bioc fast path condition in btrfs_map_block

nr_alloc_stripes can't be one if we are writing to a replacement device,
as it is incremented for that case right above.  Remove the duplicate
checks.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: scrub: remove unused btrfs_path in scrub_simple_mirror()
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 14 Jun 2023 06:39:55 +0000 (14:39 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: remove unused btrfs_path in scrub_simple_mirror()

The @path in scrub_simple_mirror() is no longer utilized after commit
e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe
infrastructure").

Before that commit, we call find_first_extent_item() directly, which
needs a path and that path can be reused.  But after that switch commit,
the extent search is done inside queue_scrub_stripe(), which will no
longer accept a path from outside.

So the @path variable can be safely removed.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ remove the stale comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
15 months agobtrfs: use folio_next_index() helper in extent_write_cache_pages
Minjie Du [Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:16:22 +0000 (15:16 +0800)]
btrfs: use folio_next_index() helper in extent_write_cache_pages

Simplify code pattern of 'folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio)' by using
the existing helper folio_next_index().

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>