netfilter: ebtables: compat: reject all padding in matches/watchers

netfilter: ebtables: compat: reject all padding in matches/watchers

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860602
commit e608f631f0ba5f1fc5ee2e260a3a35d13107cbfe upstream.

syzbot reported following splat:

BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in size_entry_mwt net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2063 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in compat_copy_entries+0x128b/0x1380 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2155
Read of size 4 at addr ffffc900004461f4 by task syz-executor267/7937

CPU: 1 PID: 7937 Comm: syz-executor267 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
 size_entry_mwt net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2063 [inline]
 compat_copy_entries+0x128b/0x1380 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2155
 compat_do_replace+0x344/0x720 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2249
 compat_do_ebt_set_ctl+0x22f/0x27e net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2333
 [..]

Because padding isn't considered during computation of ->buf_user_offset,
"total" is decremented by fewer bytes than it should.

Therefore, the first part of

if (*total < sizeof(*entry) || entry->next_offset < sizeof(*entry))

will pass, -- it should not have.  This causes oob access:
entry->next_offset is past the vmalloced size.

Reject padding and check that computed user offset (sum of ebt_entry
structure plus all individual matches/watchers/targets) is same
value that userspace gave us as the offset of the next entry.

Reported-by: syzbot+f68108fed972453a0ad4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 81e675c227ec ("netfilter: ebtables: add CONFIG_COMPAT support")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>