]> git.proxmox.com Git - pve-container.git/blame - README
debian setup: dhcp, manual and unmanaged network
[pve-container.git] / README
CommitLineData
d2a1b0d1
DM
1= Info for developers =
2
3== Command Line Tool ==
4
5Example:
6
7 # pct create 200 debian-7.0-standard_7.0-2_i386.tar.gz
8 # pct start 200
9 # pct enter 200
10 # pct stop 200
11 # pct destroy 200
12
13You can get detailed help with:
14
15 # pct help -v
16
17== Container names ==
18
19We use integers values for container names (and do not allow to use
20arbitrary names for containers).
21
22== LXC Configuration ==
23
24We store LXC container configurations on the cluster file system:
25
26 /etc/pve/nodes/<nodeid>/lxc/<CTID>/config
27
28There is a symbolic link for the local node at
29
30 /etc/pve/lxc => /etc/pve/nodes/<localhost>/lxc
31
32We store PVE related configuration using prefix 'pve', for example:
33
34 # lxc config for container 105
35 lxc.include = /usr/share/lxc/config/debian.common.conf
36 lxc.utsname = ct1
37 pve.disksize = 8
38 pve.volid = local:105/vm-105-rootfs.raw
39 # network config
40 lxc.network.type = veth
41 pve.network.bridge = vmbr0
42 pve.network.gw = 192.168.2.1
43 lxc.network.hwaddr = 86:5D:0B:28:E6:23
44 pve.network.ip = 192.168.3.106/20
45 lxc.network.name = eth0
46 lxc.network.veth.pair = veth105.0
47
48Those 'pve.network' entrioes are used by the PVE::LXCSetup classes to
49configure the network inside the containers.
50
51We only allow 'veth' networks, and use 'lxc.network.veth.pair' to
52uniquely identify the network withing the configuration file
53
54 veth<vmid>.0 => net0
55 veth<vmid>.1 => net1
56 veth<vmid>.2 => net2
57 ...
58
59
60== CRIU ==
61
62CRIU (1.5.2) does not work well with kernel 3.10.0, so checkpoint/restore
63and live migration does not work.
64
65= FAQ =
66
67* Why not LXD
68
69- LXD uses a local database to store configuration files, which simply
70 does not work with our distributed configuration file system
71 (pmxcfs)
72
14beba4c
DM
73- We want to use our existing libraries (i.e. Storage). Also see:
74 https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2015-June/009441.html
75 where they write: "Lxd will not be as flexible as lxc in many ways,
76 including with respect to backing stores."
77
78 We have a different goal, and want to support many new storage technologies
79 like zfs, ceph, ...
80
d2a1b0d1
DM
81- It is a wrapper around LXC, and only provides a REST API and new CLI
82 tool. But Proxmox VE already provides a full featured API, and CLI tools
83 are automatically generated from that API.