]> git.proxmox.com Git - pve-kernel.git/blame - patches/kernel/0227-bpf-fix-incorrect-sign-extension-in-check_alu_op.patch
KPTI: add follow-up fixes
[pve-kernel.git] / patches / kernel / 0227-bpf-fix-incorrect-sign-extension-in-check_alu_op.patch
CommitLineData
321d628a
FG
1From 652c6cabaf30e4c75f7dc2c42a33a8f066d7df2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
3Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:01:22 -0600
e4cdf2a5 4Subject: [PATCH 227/241] bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op()
321d628a
FG
5MIME-Version: 1.0
6Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
7Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
8
9[ Upstream commit 95a762e2c8c942780948091f8f2a4f32fce1ac6f ]
10
11Distinguish between
12BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit)
13and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit);
14only perform sign extension in the first case.
15
16Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as
17the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set.
18
19Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue.
20
21v3:
22 - add CVE number (Ben Hutchings)
23
24Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
25Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
26Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
27Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
28Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
29CVE-2017-16995
30Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
31Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
32Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
33(cherry picked from commit 868c88129c7567525dbde3cb6989a5acd478bd80)
34Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
35---
36 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 +++++++++++----
37 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
38
39diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
40index 4321625fe32a..cdfa07a4ef27 100644
41--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
42+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
43@@ -2048,12 +2048,19 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
44 /* case: R = imm
45 * remember the value we stored into this reg
46 */
47+ u64 imm;
48+
49+ if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
50+ imm = insn->imm;
51+ else
52+ imm = (u32)insn->imm;
53+
54 regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
55- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
56+ regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm;
57 regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0;
58- regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm;
59- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm;
60- regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(insn->imm);
61+ regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = imm;
62+ regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = imm;
63+ regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(imm);
64 regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed = false;
65 }
66
67--
682.14.2
69