]> git.proxmox.com Git - ceph.git/blame - ceph/src/boost/boost/convert/detail/has_member.hpp
import quincy beta 17.1.0
[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / boost / convert / detail / has_member.hpp
CommitLineData
20effc67 1// Copyright (c) 2009-2020 Vladimir Batov.
7c673cae
FG
2// Use, modification and distribution are subject to the Boost Software License,
3// Version 1.0. See http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt.
4
5#ifndef BOOST_CONVERT_HAS_MEMBER_HPP
6#define BOOST_CONVERT_HAS_MEMBER_HPP
7
7c673cae
FG
8#include <boost/type_traits/detail/yes_no_type.hpp>
9
10// This macro allows to check if a type has a member named "__member_name__"...
11// ... regardless of the signature. If takes advantage of the following behavior related to
12// function resolution. Say, both, foo and base, declare a method with the same name "func":
13//
14// struct foo { int func (int, int) { return 0; } };
15// struct base { void func () {} };
16// struct mixin : public foo, public base {};
17//
18// Now, if we inherit from both -- foo and base -- classes, then the following calls will fail
19// mixin_ptr(0)->func();
20// mixin_ptr(0)->func(5, 5);
21// with the error message (gcc): request for member func is ambiguous
22// regardless if we provide any arguments or not even though one might expect that
23// arg-based signature resolution might kick in. The only way to deploy those methods is:
24//
25// mixin_ptr(0)->foo::func();
26// mixin_ptr(0)->base::func(5, 5);
27//
28// C2. The actual signature of __member_name__ is not taken into account. If
29// __T__::__member_name__(any-signature) exists, then the introduced base::__member_name__
30// will cause mixin->__member_name__() call to fail to compile (due to ambiguity).
31// C3. &U::__member_name__ (a.k.a. &mixin::__member_name__)
32// has the type of func_type only if __T__::__member_name__ does not exist.
33// If __T__::member_name does exist, then mixin::__member_name__ is ambiguous
34// and "yes_type test (...)" kicks in instead.
35// C4. Need to find some unique/ugly name so that it does not clash if this macro is
36// used inside some other template class;
37
38#define BOOST_DECLARE_HAS_MEMBER(__trait_name__, __member_name__) \
39 \
40 template <typename __boost_has_member_T__> /*C4*/ \
41 class __trait_name__ \
42 { \
20effc67
TL
43 using check_type = typename boost::remove_const<__boost_has_member_T__>::type; \
44 using yes_type = ::boost::type_traits::yes_type; \
45 using no_type = ::boost::type_traits:: no_type; \
7c673cae
FG
46 \
47 struct base { void __member_name__(/*C2*/) {}}; \
48 struct mixin : public base, public check_type {}; \
49 \
50 template <void (base::*)()> struct aux {}; \
51 \
52 template <typename U> static no_type test(aux<&U::__member_name__>*); /*C3*/ \
53 template <typename U> static yes_type test(...); \
54 \
55 public: \
56 \
57 BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = (sizeof(yes_type) == sizeof(test<mixin>(0)))); \
58 }
59
60#endif // BOOST_CONVERT_HAS_MEMBER_HPP