bump version to 12.2.2-pve1

[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / libs / functional / factory / doc / factory.qbk

[library Boost.Functional/Factory
  [quickbook 1.3]
  [version 1.0]
  [authors [Schwinger, Tobias]]
  [copyright 2007 2008 Tobias Schwinger]
  [license
        Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
        (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at 
        [@http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt])
  ]
  [purpose Function object templates for object creation.]
  [category higher-order]
  [category generic]
  [last-revision $Date: 2008/11/01 21:44:52 $]
]

[def __boost_bind__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/bind/bind.html Boost.Bind]]
[def __boost__bind__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/bind/bind.html `boost::bind`]]

[def __boost__forward_adapter__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/functional/forward/doc/index.html `boost::forward_adapter`]]
[def __fusion_functional_adapters__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/fusion/doc/html/functional.html Fusion Functional Adapters]]

[def __boost_function__ [@http://www.boost.org/doc/html/function.html Boost.Function]]
[def __boost__function__ [@http://www.boost.org/doc/html/function.html `boost::function`]]

[def __smart_pointer__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/index.html Smart Pointer]]
[def __smart_pointers__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/index.html Smart Pointers]]
[def __boost__shared_ptr__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.htm `boost::shared_ptr`]]

[def __std__map__ [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/map.html `std::map`]]
[def __std__string__ [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/string.html `std::string`]]
[def __allocator__ [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/concepts/allocator.html Allocator]]
[def __std_allocator__ [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/concepts/allocator.html Allocator]]
[def __std_allocators__ [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/concepts/allocator.html Allocators]]

[def __boost__ptr_map__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/ptr_container/doc/ptr_map.html `boost::ptr_map`]]

[def __boost__factory__ `boost::factory`]
[def __boost__value_factory__ `boost::value_factory`]

[def __factory__ `factory`]
[def __value_factory__ `value_factory`]


[section Brief Description]

The template __boost__factory__ lets you encapsulate a `new` expression
as a function object, __boost__value_factory__ encapsulates a constructor
invocation without `new`.

    __boost__factory__<T*>()(arg1,arg2,arg3) 
    // same as new T(arg1,arg2,arg3)

    __boost__value_factory__<T>()(arg1,arg2,arg3)
    // same as T(arg1,arg2,arg3)

For technical reasons the arguments to the function objects have to be
LValues. A factory that also accepts RValues can be composed using the
__boost__forward_adapter__ or __boost__bind__.

[endsect]

[section Background]

In traditional Object Oriented Programming a Factory is an object implementing
an interface of one or more methods that construct objects conforming to known
interfaces.

    // assuming a_concrete_class and another_concrete_class are derived
    // from an_abstract_class

    class a_factory
    {
      public:
        virtual an_abstract_class* create() const = 0;
        virtual ~a_factory() { }
    };

    class a_concrete_factory : public a_factory
    {
      public:
        virtual an_abstract_class* create() const
        {
            return new a_concrete_class();
        }
    };

    class another_concrete_factory : public a_factory
    {
      public:
        virtual an_abstract_class* create() const
        {
            return new another_concrete_class();
        }
    };

    // [...]

    int main()
    {
        __boost__ptr_map__<__std__string__,a_factory> factories;

        // [...]

        factories.insert("a_name",std::auto_ptr<a_factory>(
            new a_concrete_factory));
        factories.insert("another_name",std::auto_ptr<a_factory>(
            new another_concrete_factory));

        // [...]

        std::auto_ptr<an_abstract_class> x(factories.at(some_name).create());

        // [...]
    }

This approach has several drawbacks. The most obvious one is that there is
lots of boilerplate code. In other words there is too much code to express
a rather simple intention. We could use templates to get rid of some of it
but the approach remains inflexible: 

* We may want a factory that takes some arguments that are forwarded to
  the constructor,
* we will probably want to use smart pointers,
* we may want several member functions to create different kinds of
  objects,
* we might not necessarily need a polymorphic base class for the objects,
* as we will see, we do not need a factory base class at all, 
* we might want to just call the constructor - without `new` to create
  an object on the stack, and
* finally we might want to use customized memory management.

Experience has shown that using function objects and generic Boost components
for their composition, Design Patterns that describe callback mechanisms
(typically requiring a high percentage of boilerplate code with pure Object
Oriented methodology) become implementable with just few code lines and without
extra classes. 

Factories are callback mechanisms for constructors, so we provide two class
templates, __boost__value_factory__ and __boost__factory__, that encapsulate
object construction via direct application of the constructor and the `new`
operator, respectively. 

We let the function objects forward their arguments to the construction
expressions they encapsulate. Over this __boost__factory__ optionally allows
the use of smart pointers and __std_allocators__.

Compile-time polymorphism can be used where appropriate,

    template< class T >
    void do_something()
    {
        // [...]
        T x = T(a,b);

        // for conceptually similar objects x we neither need virtual
        // functions nor a common base class in this context.
        // [...]
    }

Now, to allow inhomogeneous signatures for the constructors of the types passed
in for `T` we can use __value_factory__ and __boost__bind__ to normalize between
them. 

    template< class ValueFactory > 
    void do_something(ValueFactory make_obj = ValueFactory())
    {
        // [...]
        typename ValueFactory::result_type x = make_obj(a,b);

        // for conceptually similar objects x we neither need virtual
        // functions nor a common base class in this context.
        // [...]
    }

    int main()
    {
        // [...]

        do_something(__boost__value_factory__<X>());
        do_something(boost::bind(__boost__value_factory__<Y>(),_1,5,_2));
        // construct X(a,b) and Y(a,5,b), respectively.

        // [...]
    }

Maybe we want our objects to outlive the function's scope, in this case we
have to use dynamic allocation;

    template< class Factory >
    whatever do_something(Factory new_obj = Factory())
    {
        typename Factory::result_type ptr = new_obj(a,b);

        // again, no common base class or virtual functions needed,
        // we could enforce a polymorphic base by writing e.g.
        //    boost::shared_ptr<base>
        // instead of
        //    typename Factory::result_type
        // above.
        // Note that we are also free to have the type erasure happen 
        // somewhere else (e.g. in the constructor of this function's
        // result type).

        // [...]
    }

    // [... call do_something like above but with __factory__ instead
    // of __value_factory__]

Although we might have created polymorphic objects in the previous example,
we have used compile time polymorphism for the factory. If we want to erase
the type of the factory and thus allow polymorphism at run time, we can
use __boost_function__ to do so. The first example can be rewritten as 
follows.

    typedef boost::function< an_abstract_class*() > a_factory;

    // [...]

    int main()
    {
        __std__map__<__std__string__,a_factory> factories;

        // [...]

        factories["a_name"] = __boost__factory__<a_concrete_class*>();
        factories["another_name"] = 
            __boost__factory__<another_concrete_class*>();

        // [...]
    } 

Of course we can just as easy create factories that take arguments and/or
return __smart_pointers__.

[endsect]


[section:reference Reference]


[section value_factory]

[heading Description]

Function object template that invokes the constructor of the type `T`.

[heading Header]
    #include <boost/functional/value_factory.hpp>

[heading Synopsis]

    namespace boost
    {
        template< typename T >
        class value_factory;
    }

[variablelist Notation
    [[`T`]         [an arbitrary type with at least one public constructor]]
    [[`a0`...`aN`] [argument LValues to a constructor of `T`]]
    [[`F`]         [the type `value_factory<F>`]]
    [[`f`]         [an instance object of `F`]]
]

[heading Expression Semantics]

[table
    [[Expression]       [Semantics]]
    [[`F()`]            [creates an object of type `F`.]]
    [[`F(f)`]           [creates an object of type `F`.]]
    [[`f(a0`...`aN)`]   [returns `T(a0`...`aN)`.]]
    [[`F::result_type`] [is the type `T`.]]
]

[heading Limits]

The macro BOOST_FUNCTIONAL_VALUE_FACTORY_MAX_ARITY can be defined to set the
maximum arity. It defaults to 10.

[endsect]


[section factory]

[heading Description]

Function object template that dynamically constructs a pointee object for
the type of pointer given as template argument. Smart pointers may be used
for the template argument, given that `boost::pointee<Pointer>::type` yields
the pointee type.

If an __allocator__ is given, it is used for memory allocation and the 
placement form of the `new` operator is used to construct the object.
A function object that calls the destructor and deallocates the memory
with a copy of the Allocator is used for the second constructor argument
of `Pointer` (thus it must be a __smart_pointer__ that provides a suitable 
constructor, such as __boost__shared_ptr__).

If a third template argument is `factory_passes_alloc_to_smart_pointer`,
the allocator itself is used for the third constructor argument of `Pointer`
(__boost__shared_ptr__ then uses the allocator to manage the memory of its
separately allocated reference counter).

[heading Header]
    #include <boost/functional/factory.hpp>

[heading Synopsis]

    namespace boost
    {
        enum factory_alloc_propagation
        {
            factory_alloc_for_pointee_and_deleter,
            factory_passes_alloc_to_smart_pointer
        };

        template< typename Pointer, 
            class Allocator = void,
            factory_alloc_propagation AllocProp =
                factory_alloc_for_pointee_and_deleter >
        class factory;
    }

[variablelist Notation
    [[`T`]         [an arbitrary type with at least one public constructor]]
    [[`P`]         [pointer or smart pointer to `T`]]
    [[`a0`...`aN`] [argument LValues to a constructor of `T`]]
    [[`F`]         [the type `factory<P>`]]
    [[`f`]         [an instance object of `F`]]
]

[heading Expression Semantics]

[table
    [[Expression]       [Semantics]]
    [[`F()`]            [creates an object of type `F`.]]
    [[`F(f)`]           [creates an object of type `F`.]]
    [[`f(a0`...`aN)`]   [dynamically creates an object of type `T` using 
        `a0`...`aN` as arguments for the constructor invocation.]]
    [[`F::result_type`] [is the type `P` with top-level cv-qualifiers removed.]]
]

[heading Limits]

The macro BOOST_FUNCTIONAL_FACTORY_MAX_ARITY can be defined to set the
maximum arity. It defaults to 10.

[endsect]

[endsect]

[section Changes]

[heading Boost 1.58.0]

In order to remove the dependency on Boost.Optional, the default parameter
for allocators has been changed from `boost::none_t` to `void`.
If you have code that has stopped working because it uses `boost::none_t`,
a quick fix is to define `BOOST_FUNCTIONAL_FACTORY_SUPPORT_NONE_T`, which will
restore support, but this will be removed in a future release.
It should be be relatively easy to fix this properly.

[endsect]

[section Acknowledgements]

Eric Niebler requested a function to invoke a type's constructor (with the 
arguments supplied as a Tuple) as a Fusion feature. These Factory utilities are
a factored-out generalization of this idea.

Dave Abrahams suggested Smart Pointer support for exception safety, providing
useful hints for the implementation.

Joel de Guzman's documentation style was copied from Fusion.

Further, I want to thank Peter Dimov for sharing his insights on language
details and their evolution.

[endsect]

[section References]

# [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns Design Patterns],
  Gamma et al. - Addison Wesley Publishing, 1995

# [@http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/ Standard Template Library Programmer's Guide], 
  Hewlett-Packard Company, 1994

# [@http://www.boost.org/libs/bind/bind.html Boost.Bind], 
  Peter Dimov, 2001-2005

# [@http://www.boost.org/doc/html/function.html Boost.Function],
  Douglas Gregor, 2001-2004

[endsect]