]> git.proxmox.com Git - ceph.git/blob - ceph/src/boost/libs/math/doc/sf/digamma.qbk
bump version to 12.2.2-pve1
[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / libs / math / doc / sf / digamma.qbk
1 [section:digamma Digamma]
2
3 [h4 Synopsis]
4
5 ``
6 #include <boost/math/special_functions/digamma.hpp>
7 ``
8
9 namespace boost{ namespace math{
10
11 template <class T>
12 ``__sf_result`` digamma(T z);
13
14 template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
15 ``__sf_result`` digamma(T z, const ``__Policy``&);
16
17 }} // namespaces
18
19 [h4 Description]
20
21 Returns the digamma or psi function of /x/. Digamma is defined as the logarithmic
22 derivative of the gamma function:
23
24 [equation digamma1]
25
26 [graph digamma]
27
28 [optional_policy]
29
30 The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_promotion_rules:
31 the result is of type `double` when T is an integer type, and type T otherwise.
32
33 [h4 Accuracy]
34
35 The following table shows the peak errors (in units of epsilon)
36 found on various platforms with various floating point types.
37 Unless otherwise specified any floating point type that is narrower
38 than the one shown will have __zero_error.
39
40 [table_digamma]
41
42 As shown above, error rates for positive arguments are generally very low.
43 For negative arguments there are an infinite number of irrational roots:
44 relative errors very close to these can be arbitrarily large, although
45 absolute error will remain very low.
46
47 [h4 Testing]
48
49 There are two sets of tests: spot values are computed using
50 the online calculator at functions.wolfram.com, while random test values
51 are generated using the high-precision reference implementation (a
52 differentiated __lanczos see below).
53
54 [h4 Implementation]
55
56 The implementation is divided up into the following domains:
57
58 For Negative arguments the reflection formula:
59
60 digamma(1-x) = digamma(x) + pi/tan(pi*x);
61
62 is used to make /x/ positive.
63
64 For arguments in the range [0,1] the recurrence relation:
65
66 digamma(x) = digamma(x+1) - 1/x
67
68 is used to shift the evaluation to [1,2].
69
70 For arguments in the range [1,2] a rational approximation [jm_rationals] is used (see below).
71
72 For arguments in the range [2,BIG] the recurrence relation:
73
74 digamma(x+1) = digamma(x) + 1/x;
75
76 is used to shift the evaluation to the range [1,2].
77
78 For arguments > BIG the asymptotic expansion:
79
80 [equation digamma2]
81
82 can be used. However, this expansion is divergent after a few terms:
83 exactly how many terms depends on the size of /x/. Therefore the value
84 of /BIG/ must be chosen so that the series can be truncated at a term
85 that is too small to have any effect on the result when evaluated at /BIG/.
86 Choosing BIG=10 for up to 80-bit reals, and BIG=20 for 128-bit reals allows
87 the series to truncated after a suitably small number of terms and evaluated
88 as a polynomial in `1/(x*x)`.
89
90 The arbitrary precision version of this function uses recurrence relations until
91 x > BIG, and then evaluation via the asymptotic expansion above. As special cases
92 integer and half integer arguments are handled via:
93
94 [equation digamma4]
95
96 [equation digamma5]
97
98 The rational approximation [jm_rationals] in the range [1,2] is derived as follows.
99
100 First a high precision approximation to digamma was constructed using a 60-term
101 differentiated __lanczos, the form used is:
102
103 [equation digamma3]
104
105 Where P(x) and Q(x) are the polynomials from the rational form of the Lanczos sum,
106 and P'(x) and Q'(x) are their first derivatives. The Lanzos part of this
107 approximation has a theoretical precision of ~100 decimal digits. However,
108 cancellation in the above sum will reduce that to around `99-(1/y)` digits
109 if /y/ is the result. This approximation was used to calculate the positive root
110 of digamma, and was found to agree with the value used by
111 Cody to 25 digits (See Math. Comp. 27, 123-127 (1973) by Cody, Strecok and Thacher)
112 and with the value used by Morris to 35 digits (See TOMS Algorithm 708).
113
114 Likewise a few spot tests agreed with values calculated using
115 functions.wolfram.com to >40 digits.
116 That's sufficiently precise to insure that the approximation below is
117 accurate to double precision. Achieving 128-bit long double precision requires that
118 the location of the root is known to ~70 digits, and it's not clear whether
119 the value calculated by this method meets that requirement: the difficulty
120 lies in independently verifying the value obtained.
121
122 The rational approximation [jm_rationals] was optimised for absolute error using the form:
123
124 digamma(x) = (x - X0)(Y + R(x - 1));
125
126 Where X0 is the positive root of digamma, Y is a constant, and R(x - 1) is the
127 rational approximation. Note that since X0 is irrational, we need twice as many
128 digits in X0 as in x in order to avoid cancellation error during the subtraction
129 (this assumes that /x/ is an exact value, if it's not then all bets are off). That
130 means that even when x is the value of the root rounded to the nearest
131 representable value, the result of digamma(x) ['[*will not be zero]].
132
133
134 [endsect][/section:digamma The Digamma Function]
135
136 [/
137 Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow.
138 Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
139 (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
140 http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt).
141 ]
142