]> git.proxmox.com Git - ceph.git/blob - ceph/src/boost/libs/math/doc/sf/lgamma.qbk
bump version to 12.2.2-pve1
[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / libs / math / doc / sf / lgamma.qbk
1 [section:lgamma Log Gamma]
2
3 [h4 Synopsis]
4
5 ``
6 #include <boost/math/special_functions/gamma.hpp>
7 ``
8
9 namespace boost{ namespace math{
10
11 template <class T>
12 ``__sf_result`` lgamma(T z);
13
14 template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
15 ``__sf_result`` lgamma(T z, const ``__Policy``&);
16
17 template <class T>
18 ``__sf_result`` lgamma(T z, int* sign);
19
20 template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
21 ``__sf_result`` lgamma(T z, int* sign, const ``__Policy``&);
22
23 }} // namespaces
24
25 [h4 Description]
26
27 The [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function lgamma function] is defined by:
28
29 [equation lgamm1]
30
31 The second form of the function takes a pointer to an integer,
32 which if non-null is set on output to the sign of tgamma(z).
33
34 [optional_policy]
35
36 [graph lgamma]
37
38 There are effectively two versions of this function internally: a fully
39 generic version that is slow, but reasonably accurate, and a much more
40 efficient approximation that is used where the number of digits in the significand
41 of T correspond to a certain __lanczos. In practice, any built-in
42 floating-point type you will encounter has an appropriate __lanczos
43 defined for it. It is also possible, given enough machine time, to generate
44 further __lanczos's using the program libs/math/tools/lanczos_generator.cpp.
45
46 The return type of these functions is computed using the __arg_promotion_rules:
47 the result is of type `double` if T is an integer type, or type T otherwise.
48
49 [h4 Accuracy]
50
51 The following table shows the peak errors (in units of epsilon)
52 found on various platforms
53 with various floating point types, along with comparisons to
54 various other libraries. Unless otherwise specified any
55 floating point type that is narrower than the one shown will have
56 __zero_error.
57
58 Note that while the relative errors near the positive roots of lgamma
59 are very low, the lgamma function has an infinite number of irrational
60 roots for negative arguments: very close to these negative roots only
61 a low absolute error can be guaranteed.
62
63 [table_lgamma]
64
65 [h4 Testing]
66
67 The main tests for this function involve comparisons against the logs of
68 the factorials which can be independently calculated to very high accuracy.
69
70 Random tests in key problem areas are also used.
71
72 [h4 Implementation]
73
74 The generic version of this function is implemented using Sterling's approximation
75 for large arguments:
76
77 [equation gamma6]
78
79 For small arguments, the logarithm of tgamma is used.
80
81 For negative /z/ the logarithm version of the
82 reflection formula is used:
83
84 [equation lgamm3]
85
86 For types of known precision, the __lanczos is used, a traits class
87 `boost::math::lanczos::lanczos_traits` maps type T to an appropriate
88 approximation. The logarithmic version of the __lanczos is:
89
90 [equation lgamm4]
91
92 Where L[sub e,g][space] is the Lanczos sum, scaled by e[super g].
93
94 As before the reflection formula is used for /z < 0/.
95
96 When z is very near 1 or 2, then the logarithmic version of the __lanczos
97 suffers very badly from cancellation error: indeed for values sufficiently
98 close to 1 or 2, arbitrarily large relative errors can be obtained (even though
99 the absolute error is tiny).
100
101 For types with up to 113 bits of precision
102 (up to and including 128-bit long doubles), root-preserving
103 rational approximations [jm_rationals] are used
104 over the intervals [1,2] and [2,3]. Over the interval [2,3] the approximation
105 form used is:
106
107 lgamma(z) = (z-2)(z+1)(Y + R(z-2));
108
109 Where Y is a constant, and R(z-2) is the rational approximation: optimised
110 so that it's absolute error is tiny compared to Y. In addition
111 small values of z greater
112 than 3 can handled by argument reduction using the recurrence relation:
113
114 lgamma(z+1) = log(z) + lgamma(z);
115
116 Over the interval [1,2] two approximations have to be used, one for small z uses:
117
118 lgamma(z) = (z-1)(z-2)(Y + R(z-1));
119
120 Once again Y is a constant, and R(z-1) is optimised for low absolute error
121 compared to Y. For z > 1.5 the above form wouldn't converge to a
122 minimax solution but this similar form does:
123
124 lgamma(z) = (2-z)(1-z)(Y + R(2-z));
125
126 Finally for z < 1 the recurrence relation can be used to move to z > 1:
127
128 lgamma(z) = lgamma(z+1) - log(z);
129
130 Note that while this involves a subtraction, it appears not
131 to suffer from cancellation error: as z decreases from 1
132 the `-log(z)` term grows positive much more
133 rapidly than the `lgamma(z+1)` term becomes negative. So in this
134 specific case, significant digits are preserved, rather than cancelled.
135
136 For other types which do have a __lanczos defined for them
137 the current solution is as follows: imagine we
138 balance the two terms in the __lanczos by dividing the power term by its value
139 at /z = 1/, and then multiplying the Lanczos coefficients by the same value.
140 Now each term will take the value 1 at /z = 1/ and we can rearrange the power terms
141 in terms of log1p. Likewise if we subtract 1 from the Lanczos sum part
142 (algebraically, by subtracting the value of each term at /z = 1/), we obtain
143 a new summation that can be also be fed into log1p. Crucially, all of the
144 terms tend to zero, as /z -> 1/:
145
146 [equation lgamm5]
147
148 The C[sub k][space] terms in the above are the same as in the __lanczos.
149
150 A similar rearrangement can be performed at /z = 2/:
151
152 [equation lgamm6]
153
154 [endsect][/section:lgamma The Log Gamma Function]
155
156 [/
157 Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow.
158 Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
159 (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
160 http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt).
161 ]