]> git.proxmox.com Git - ceph.git/blob - ceph/src/boost/libs/tti/doc/tti_nested_type_and_signatures.qbk
bump version to 12.2.2-pve1
[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / libs / tti / doc / tti_nested_type_and_signatures.qbk
1 [/
2 (C) Copyright Edward Diener 2011,2012
3 Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
4 (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
5 http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt).
6 ]
7
8 [section:tti_func_sig Nested Types and Function Signatures]
9
10 The strength of `BOOST_TTI_MEMBER_TYPE` to represent a type which may or may not exist, and which
11 then can be subsequently used in other macro metafunctions whenever a type is needed as a template
12 parameter without producing a compiler error, should not be underestimated. It is one of the
13 reasons why we have two different ways of using our generated metafunction when introspecting
14 for member data, a member function, or a static member function of an enclosing type.
15
16 In the cases where we specify a composite syntax when using `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_DATA`,
17 `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION`, or `BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION`, the signature
18 for the member data, member function, or static member function is a single type. For
19 `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_DATA` the signature is a pointer to member data, for
20 `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION` the signature is a pointer to a member function, and for
21 `BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION` the signature is divided between an enclosing type
22 and a function in composite format. This makes for a syntactical notation which is natural
23 to specify, but because of the notation we can not use the nested type functionality in
24 `BOOST_TTI_MEMBER_TYPE` for potential parts of these composite types. If any part of this
25 signature, which specifies a composite of various types, is invalid, a compiler time error
26 will occur.
27
28 But in the more specific cases, when we use `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_DATA`,
29 `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION`, and `BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION`, our composite
30 type in our signatures is broken down into their individual types so that using
31 `BOOST_TTI_MEMBER_TYPE` for any one of the individual types will not lead to a compile time
32 error if the type specified does not actually exist.
33
34 A few examples will suffice.
35
36 Given known types T and U, and the supposed type Ntype as a
37 nested type of U, we want to find out if type T has a member function whose signature is
38 `void aMemberFunction(U::Ntype)`.
39
40 First using `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION` using our composite form we would code:
41
42 #include <boost/tti/has_member_function.hpp>
43
44 BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION(aMemberFunction)
45
46 has_member_function_aMemberFunction<void (T::*)(U::Ntype)>::value;
47
48 If the nested type U::Ntype does not exist, this leads to a compiler error.
49 We really want to avoid this situation, so let's try our alternative.
50
51 Second using `BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION` using our specific form we would code:
52
53 #include <boost/tti/member_type.hpp>
54 #include <boost/tti/has_member_function.hpp>
55
56 BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_TYPE(Ntype)
57 BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_FUNCTION(aMemberFunction)
58
59 typedef typename has_member_type_Ntype<U>::type OurType;
60 has_member_function_aMemberFunction<T,void,boost::mpl::vector<OurType> >::value;
61
62 If the nested type U::Ntype does exist and T does have a member function
63 whose signature is `void aMemberFunction(U::Ntype)` our 'value' is true,
64 otherwise it is false. We will never get a compiler error in this case.
65
66 As a second example we will once again use the suppositions of our first
67 example; given known types T and U, and the supposed type Ntype as a
68 nested type of U. But this time let us look for a static member function
69 whose signature is `void aStaticMemberFunction(U::Ntype)`.
70
71 First using `BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION` using our composite form we would code:
72
73 #include <boost/tti/has_static_member_function.hpp>
74
75 BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION(aStaticMemberFunction)
76
77 has_static_member_function_aStaticMemberFunction<T,void (U::Ntype)>::value;
78
79 Once again if the nested type U::Ntype does not exist, this leads to a compiler error,
80 so let's try our alternative.
81
82 Second using `BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION` using our specific form we would code:
83
84 #include <boost/tti/member_type.hpp>
85 #include <boost/tti/has_static_member_function.hpp>
86
87 BOOST_TTI_HAS_MEMBER_TYPE(Ntype)
88 BOOST_TTI_HAS_STATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION(aStaticMemberFunction)
89
90 typedef typename has_member_type_Ntype<U>::type OurType;
91 has_static_member_function_aStaticMemberFunction<T,void,boost::mpl::vector<OurType> >::value;
92
93 If the nested type U::Ntype does exist and T does have a member function
94 whose signature is `void aMemberFunction(U::Ntype)` our 'value' is true,
95 otherwise it is false. We will never get a compiler error in this case.
96
97 [endsect]