-In general SSDs will provide more IOPs than spinning disks. This fact and the
-higher cost may make a xref:pve_ceph_device_classes[class based] separation of
-pools appealing. Another possibility to speedup OSDs is to use a faster disk
-as journal or DB/**W**rite-**A**head-**L**og device, see
-xref:pve_ceph_osds[creating Ceph OSDs]. If a faster disk is used for multiple
-OSDs, a proper balance between OSD and WAL / DB (or journal) disk must be
-selected, otherwise the faster disk becomes the bottleneck for all linked OSDs.
-
-Aside from the disk type, Ceph best performs with an even sized and distributed
-amount of disks per node. For example, 4 x 500 GB disks with in each node is
+In general, SSDs will provide more IOPS than spinning disks. With this in mind,
+in addition to the higher cost, it may make sense to implement a
+xref:pve_ceph_device_classes[class based] separation of pools. Another way to
+speed up OSDs is to use a faster disk as a journal or
+DB/**W**rite-**A**head-**L**og device, see
+xref:pve_ceph_osds[creating Ceph OSDs].
+If a faster disk is used for multiple OSDs, a proper balance between OSD
+and WAL / DB (or journal) disk must be selected, otherwise the faster disk
+becomes the bottleneck for all linked OSDs.
+
+Aside from the disk type, Ceph performs best with an even sized and distributed
+amount of disks per node. For example, 4 x 500 GB disks within each node is