import quincy beta 17.1.0

[ceph.git] / ceph / src / boost / boost / bimap / detail / concept_tags.hpp

diff --git a/ceph/src/boost/boost/bimap/detail/concept_tags.hpp b/ceph/src/boost/boost/bimap/detail/concept_tags.hpp
index fc3ab5c1c0c56a214180c235f288267c25ec8f36..c5c9fff299a145fa4122485eeba76a4a1730ff62 100644 (file)
--- a/ceph/src/boost/boost/bimap/detail/concept_tags.hpp
+++ b/ceph/src/boost/boost/bimap/detail/concept_tags.hpp
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ metafunctions. For example now is easy to create a is_set_type_of metafunction.
 
 struct set_type_of_tag          {};
 
-/// \brief Tag of {SetType}_of_relation defition classes
+/// \brief Tag of {SetType}_of_relation definition classes
 
 struct set_type_of_relation_tag {};
 
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ See also left_based.
 struct left_based : ::boost::bimaps::detail::side_based_tag
 {
     // I run into troubles if I do not define bind for side based tags.
-    // Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developped.
+    // Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developed.
     template< class Relation > struct bind_to { typedef void type; };
 
     typedef mpl::bool_<true>  left_mutable_key;
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct left_based : ::boost::bimaps::detail::side_based_tag
 struct right_based : ::boost::bimaps::detail::side_based_tag
 {
     // I run into troubles if I do not define bind for side based tags.
-    // Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developped.
+    // Maybe a more coherent way of binding the relation can be developed.
     template< class Relation > struct bind_to { typedef void type; };
 
     typedef mpl::bool_<true>  left_mutable_key;