qm: emulated devices: mention that virtio devices are better maintained

[pve-docs.git] / qm.adoc

diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index 6fc6f5e38a8da6cce25778f036e5ca465cac32ee..c3865cb0b68f721ccd54ae9403d6272e7f0ce681 100644 (file)
--- a/qm.adoc
+++ b/qm.adoc
@@ -80,12 +80,12 @@ controller, a paravirtualized network card, a paravirtualized serial port,
 a paravirtualized SCSI controller, etc ...
 
 It is highly recommended to use the virtio devices whenever you can, as they
-provide a big performance improvement. Using  the virtio generic disk controller
-versus an emulated IDE controller will double the sequential write throughput,
-as measured with `bonnie++(8)`. Using the virtio network interface can deliver
-up to three times the throughput of an emulated Intel E1000 network card, as
-measured with `iperf(1)`. footnote:[See this benchmark on the KVM wiki
-https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Using_VirtIO_NIC]
+provide a big performance improvement and are generally better maintained. Using
+the virtio generic disk controller versus an emulated IDE controller will double
+the sequential write throughput, as measured with `bonnie++(8)`. Using the
+virtio network interface can deliver up to three times the throughput of an
+emulated Intel E1000 network card, as measured with `iperf(1)`. footnote:[See
+this benchmark on the KVM wiki https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Using_VirtIO_NIC]
 
 
 [[qm_virtual_machines_settings]]