Coverity complains about a possible NULL pointer dereference. This is
impossible, but it suspects it because we do a NULL check against
`spa->spa_root_vdev`. This NULL check was never necessary and makes the
code harder to understand, so we drop it.
In particular, we dereference `spa->spa_root_vdev` when `new_state !=
POOL_STATE_UNINITIALIZED && !hardforce`. The first is only true when
spa_reset is called, which only occurs under fault injection. The
second is true unless `zpool export -F $POOLNAME` is used. Therefore,
we effectively *always* dereference the pointer. In the cases where we
do not, there is no reason to think it is unsafe. Therefore this change
is safe to make.
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes #13905