In an effort to clean the documentation of the above
package, remove duplicated words.
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
- SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume volume will\r
+ SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume will\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
- SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume volume will\r
+ SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume will\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
- SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume volume will\r
+ SourceFv - Address of the Fv in memory, this firmware volume will\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
be modified, if SourceFfsFile exists\r
SourceFfsFile - Input FFS file to replace\r
\r
@retval TRUE DevicePath is valid.\r
@retval FALSE DevicePath is NULL.\r
@retval FALSE Maxsize is less than sizeof(EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).\r
@retval TRUE DevicePath is valid.\r
@retval FALSE DevicePath is NULL.\r
@retval FALSE Maxsize is less than sizeof(EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).\r
- @retval FALSE The length of any node node in the DevicePath is less\r
+ @retval FALSE The length of any node in the DevicePath is less\r
than sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).\r
@retval FALSE If MaxSize is not zero, the size of the DevicePath\r
exceeds MaxSize.\r
than sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).\r
@retval FALSE If MaxSize is not zero, the size of the DevicePath\r
exceeds MaxSize.\r
return STATUS_ERROR;\r
}\r
if (TempNumber == 0) {\r
return STATUS_ERROR;\r
}\r
if (TempNumber == 0) {\r
- Error (NULL, 0, 1003, "Invalid option value", "Fv block size can't be be set to zero");\r
+ Error (NULL, 0, 1003, "Invalid option value", "Fv block size can't be set to zero");\r
return STATUS_ERROR;\r
}\r
mFvDataInfo.FvBlocks[0].Length = (UINT32) TempNumber;\r
return STATUS_ERROR;\r
}\r
mFvDataInfo.FvBlocks[0].Length = (UINT32) TempNumber;\r
if (p == NULL) return NULL;\r
\r
/* this appears strange: why do we OR the context\r
if (p == NULL) return NULL;\r
\r
/* this appears strange: why do we OR the context\r
- of and AND predicate ? It is because of the way\r
+ of an AND predicate ? It is because of the way\r
that predicates are evaluated: if the context is\r
wrong then it's the same as if the predicate was\r
true. That means that even when one leg of an\r
that predicates are evaluated: if the context is\r
wrong then it's the same as if the predicate was\r
true. That means that even when one leg of an\r
* 1. if lookahead for alt i is contained in the lookahead for any\r
* alt j then ignore semantic predicate of alt i\r
* 2. if lookahead for alt i is not contained in the lookahead for\r
* 1. if lookahead for alt i is contained in the lookahead for any\r
* alt j then ignore semantic predicate of alt i\r
* 2. if lookahead for alt i is not contained in the lookahead for\r
- * any alt j then add add predicate i to the OR list to be hoisted\r
+ * any alt j then add predicate i to the OR list to be hoisted\r
* 3. if lookahead for alt i overlaps the lookahead for some alt j then\r
* add a dummy semantic predicate for alt j\r
*\r
* 3. if lookahead for alt i overlaps the lookahead for some alt j then\r
* add a dummy semantic predicate for alt j\r
*\r