migration/postcopy: fix typo in mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin's comment

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20191005220517.24029-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
index 08a3ed516eb5d0e01dc4f847651465964be5e8c4..3a72f7b4fe0337d772da175f3aa8904054adb9e1 100644 (file)
--- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
+++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
@@ -768,9 +768,11 @@ static void mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin(uintptr_t addr, uint32_t ptid,
     atomic_xchg(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu], low_time_offset);
     atomic_xchg(&dc->vcpu_addr[cpu], addr);
 
-    /* check it here, not at the begining of the function,
-     * due to, check could accur early than bitmap_set in
-     * qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl */
+    /*
+     * check it here, not at the beginning of the function,
+     * due to, check could occur early than bitmap_set in
+     * qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl
+     */
     already_received = ramblock_recv_bitmap_test(rb, (void *)addr);
     if (already_received) {
         atomic_xchg(&dc->vcpu_addr[cpu], 0);