]> git.proxmox.com Git - pve-kernel.git/blob - patches/kernel/0015-sched-core-Drop-spinlocks-on-contention-iff-kernel-i.patch
rebase patches on top of Ubuntu-6.5.0-27.27
[pve-kernel.git] / patches / kernel / 0015-sched-core-Drop-spinlocks-on-contention-iff-kernel-i.patch
1 From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
3 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:47:23 -0800
4 Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Drop spinlocks on contention iff kernel is
5 preemptible
6
7 Use preempt_model_preemptible() to detect a preemptible kernel when
8 deciding whether or not to reschedule in order to drop a contended
9 spinlock or rwlock. Because PREEMPT_DYNAMIC selects PREEMPTION, kernels
10 built with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y will yield contended locks even if the live
11 preemption model is "none" or "voluntary". In short, make kernels with
12 dynamically selected models behave the same as kernels with statically
13 selected models.
14
15 Somewhat counter-intuitively, NOT yielding a lock can provide better
16 latency for the relevant tasks/processes. E.g. KVM x86's mmu_lock, a
17 rwlock, is often contended between an invalidation event (takes mmu_lock
18 for write) and a vCPU servicing a guest page fault (takes mmu_lock for
19 read). For _some_ setups, letting the invalidation task complete even
20 if there is mmu_lock contention provides lower latency for *all* tasks,
21 i.e. the invalidation completes sooner *and* the vCPU services the guest
22 page fault sooner.
23
24 But even KVM's mmu_lock behavior isn't uniform, e.g. the "best" behavior
25 can vary depending on the host VMM, the guest workload, the number of
26 vCPUs, the number of pCPUs in the host, why there is lock contention, etc.
27
28 In other words, simply deleting the CONFIG_PREEMPTION guard (or doing the
29 opposite and removing contention yielding entirely) needs to come with a
30 big pile of data proving that changing the status quo is a net positive.
31
32 Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
33 Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
34 Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
35 Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
36 Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
37 Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
38 ---
39 include/linux/sched.h | 14 ++++++--------
40 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
41
42 diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
43 index 609bde814cb0..995e6699e026 100644
44 --- a/include/linux/sched.h
45 +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
46 @@ -2211,11 +2211,10 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_preemptible(void)
47 */
48 static inline int spin_needbreak(spinlock_t *lock)
49 {
50 -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
51 + if (!preempt_model_preemptible())
52 + return 0;
53 +
54 return spin_is_contended(lock);
55 -#else
56 - return 0;
57 -#endif
58 }
59
60 /*
61 @@ -2228,11 +2227,10 @@ static inline int spin_needbreak(spinlock_t *lock)
62 */
63 static inline int rwlock_needbreak(rwlock_t *lock)
64 {
65 -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
66 + if (!preempt_model_preemptible())
67 + return 0;
68 +
69 return rwlock_is_contended(lock);
70 -#else
71 - return 0;
72 -#endif
73 }
74
75 static __always_inline bool need_resched(void)